thehockeyguru wrote:canaan wrote:Rutgers is the best of the bunch, from a business perspective.
Why?
the NY market
Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
thehockeyguru wrote:canaan wrote:Rutgers is the best of the bunch, from a business perspective.
Why?


ulf wrote:The NY market has the Jets and Giants. Heck they watch Notre Dame more than Rutgers. The Rutgers = NYC market is a myth.

KennyTheKangaroo wrote:ulf wrote:hehe welcome back rocco
kenny the kangaroo hasnt checked lgp.com since wednesday, and lo and behold rocco goes on a vintage rant on college fb. what a great day to return to lgp.com.


Rocco wrote:KennyTheKangaroo wrote:ulf wrote:hehe welcome back rocco
kenny the kangaroo hasnt checked lgp.com since wednesday, and lo and behold rocco goes on a vintage rant on college fb. what a great day to return to lgp.com.
I was planning on staying on hiatus until the lockout ended, but that's not happening and I needed my fix of doom because a broke, rotgut program is leaving the ACC.

ulf wrote:The NY market has the Jets and Giants. Heck they watch Notre Dame more than Rutgers. The Rutgers = NYC market is a myth.

thehockeyguru wrote:In the end if Maryland leaves, the ACC will look to UConn. Regardless of your opinion on Maryland that isn't a swap that benefits the conference in anything other than Basketball. The increased focus on basketball will likely irk Clemson and FSU no doubt.


The University of Maryland Board of Regents unanimously approved a move to the Big Ten on Monday, a source tells ESPN colleague Brett McMurphy.
An official announcement is expected at 4 p.m. ET at the school's campus in College Park, Md.


columbia wrote:The Dude has just been vindicated.

thehockeyguru wrote:If Maryland leaves I think the SEC will call FSU and Clemson shortly after. Then the chaos will ensue.

thehockeyguru wrote:Rocco wrote:KennyTheKangaroo wrote:ulf wrote:hehe welcome back rocco
kenny the kangaroo hasnt checked lgp.com since wednesday, and lo and behold rocco goes on a vintage rant on college fb. what a great day to return to lgp.com.
I was planning on staying on hiatus until the lockout ended, but that's not happening and I needed my fix of doom because a broke, rotgut program is leaving the ACC.
In the end if Maryland leaves, the ACC will look to UConn. Regardless of your opinion on Maryland that isn't a swap that benefits the conference in anything other than Basketball. The increased focus on basketball will likely irk Clemson and FSU no doubt.

thehockeyguru wrote:If Maryland leaves I think the SEC will call FSU and Clemson shortly after. Then the chaos will ensue.

Rocco wrote:thehockeyguru wrote:Rocco wrote:KennyTheKangaroo wrote:ulf wrote:hehe welcome back rocco
kenny the kangaroo hasnt checked lgp.com since wednesday, and lo and behold rocco goes on a vintage rant on college fb. what a great day to return to lgp.com.
I was planning on staying on hiatus until the lockout ended, but that's not happening and I needed my fix of doom because a broke, rotgut program is leaving the ACC.
In the end if Maryland leaves, the ACC will look to UConn. Regardless of your opinion on Maryland that isn't a swap that benefits the conference in anything other than Basketball. The increased focus on basketball will likely irk Clemson and FSU no doubt.
I'm sure FSU and Clemson are truly going to miss a program that's been horribly mismanaged and in massive debt like MD. It doesn't hurt in football. At most it will result in slightly worse TV spots in Baltimore TV. Nobody in DC watches MD football. VT/UVA give the ACC television exposure in that market.

newarenanow wrote:thehockeyguru wrote:If Maryland leaves I think the SEC will call FSU and Clemson shortly after. Then the chaos will ensue.
I don't know if they will. I think if the SEC expands, it will be to VT and NC St. They will want those markets.
FSU and Clemsons only options IMO is the Big XII if they want to move.
Big 10 will want UVA and UNC if they go to 16.
I think this is up to FSu to keep the ACC together. IF they stay, I think the VA and NC schools are happy and will stay. IF FSU goes and Clemson goes with them, then the SEC and Big 10 will slice up the UNC/UVA (to Big 10) and NC St and VT (to SEC) so all schools have a safe landing spot for political reasons within the state.

canaan wrote:ulf wrote:The NY market has the Jets and Giants. Heck they watch Notre Dame more than Rutgers. The Rutgers = NYC market is a myth.
myth or not, the potential to tap into a market given what the conference feels is a core group of college powerhouses (Ohio St, Penn St, Michigan), it is worth the add in their eyes.

newarenanow wrote:...the carriage rate goes from like .08 a subscriber to .80 cents.ulf wrote:The NY market has the Jets and Giants. Heck they watch Notre Dame more than Rutgers. The Rutgers = NYC market is a myth.
Before, the NY area cable markets could care less about the BTN, even if RU was in the Big 10, so it wasn't a net win for the Big 10. But now that FOX owns the YES network, they are going to package it to a higher tier with the BTN network, and now just having RU is a goldmine.
.

ExPatriatePen wrote:canaan wrote:ulf wrote:The NY market has the Jets and Giants. Heck they watch Notre Dame more than Rutgers. The Rutgers = NYC market is a myth.
myth or not, the potential to tap into a market given what the conference feels is a core group of college powerhouses (Ohio St, Penn St, Michigan), it is worth the add in their eyes.
Honest to God, maybe one of every 50 sports fans here in NY (and I'm speaking of folks that read the sports section, listen to FAN, have season tickets to a Pro team here in the NYc market, or subscribe to One or more Cable TV sports networks), one in 50 of those folks could name three of the top ten CFB programs right now.
It's sad.

canaan wrote:ExPatriatePen wrote:canaan wrote:ulf wrote:The NY market has the Jets and Giants. Heck they watch Notre Dame more than Rutgers. The Rutgers = NYC market is a myth.
myth or not, the potential to tap into a market given what the conference feels is a core group of college powerhouses (Ohio St, Penn St, Michigan), it is worth the add in their eyes.
Honest to God, maybe one of every 50 sports fans here in NY (and I'm speaking of folks that read the sports section, listen to FAN, have season tickets to a Pro team here in the NYc market, or subscribe to One or more Cable TV sports networks), one in 50 of those folks could name three of the top ten CFB programs right now.
It's sad.
ill make this analogy, though it may not work to express what i feel the Big Ten is doing:
They are building a small casino in the desert. If it fails, there is still profit to be had with television contracts. If it succeeds, you have Las Vegas and the ability to print money.

ExPatriatePen wrote:Maybe it's just me, but the one college football conference I have ZERO interest in is the B1G. The games just don't capture my interest AT ALL. I don't care for their brand of football.


ExPatriatePen wrote:Maybe it's just me, but the one college football conference I have ZERO interest in is the B1G. The games just don't capture my interest AT ALL. I don't care for their brand of football.

canaan wrote:ExPatriatePen wrote:Maybe it's just me, but the one college football conference I have ZERO interest in is the B1G. The games just don't capture my interest AT ALL. I don't care for their brand of football.
i like the big ten, but a lot of that is nostalgia-based. Before the NCAA sold their souls to CBS and the SEC machine, the big ten was the cash cow. when they realized they could maximize their profits placating the southern CFB fanaticism in the sec/big xii (mainly texas/oklahoma), the big ten took a proverbial backseat.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest