Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf

Notre Dame had a very legit schedule. Theres no arguing that.sniper wrote:Notre Dame shouldn't be in this game. They didn't play anyone who was any good the entire year. The difference in the strength of their schedule and Alabama's is massive. Notre Dame is at best a top 10 team.

ulf wrote:Grunthy wrote:Ok we get it. Some of you hate notre dame. Now just watch the game without being ******* about it. Not all of notre dame fans are arrogant.
Debatable



TheHammer24 wrote:Notre Dame had a very legit schedule. Theres no arguing that.sniper wrote:Notre Dame shouldn't be in this game. They didn't play anyone who was any good the entire year. The difference in the strength of their schedule and Alabama's is massive. Notre Dame is at best a top 10 team.







Alejandro Rojas wrote:SEC fans are far, far worse than Notre Dame fans. They are going to be insufferable.




Alejandro Rojas wrote:SEC fans are far, far worse than Notre Dame fans. They are going to be insufferable.

columbia wrote:Alejandro Rojas wrote:SEC fans are far, far worse than Notre Dame fans. They are going to be insufferable.
I thought you lived in Canada.





TheHammer24 wrote:Notre Dame had a very legit schedule. Theres no arguing that.sniper wrote:Notre Dame shouldn't be in this game. They didn't play anyone who was any good the entire year. The difference in the strength of their schedule and Alabama's is massive. Notre Dame is at best a top 10 team.



columbia wrote:They beat Pitt.

Users browsing this forum: blackjack68, DudeMan2766, Eismann, jimreb, pensfan1989, Rocco, Spangler and 14 guests