bhaw wrote:1 of those attempts was from Skelton.
Who still averaged more yards per carry than Stephens Howling with his 1 yard.
Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
bhaw wrote:1 of those attempts was from Skelton.





mikey287 wrote:I mean, this is really just poor to see. You have a quarterback that clearly can't play at this level, no command of the offense, doesn't get any confidence from his teammates, doesn't have the skills to sit back there and pass. Picked up some stats in garbage time, but just isn't good enough to play at this level...and frankly, whatever level is below this, I don't think he'd stand out there either. His footwork is poor, his reads are poor, if it's not there on the first look he's panicked and just stares down his first option and when you're playing a team like San Francisco, they're gonna see that right away. And above all, he can't throw the football...it's not even a case of "all arm, no head" like Josh Freeman in Tampa Bay...you got a no arm, no head, no heart, no nothing situation there...and I saw the rookie they have play for SDSU, Lindley or whatever...he couldn't hit a tree if he was standing in the rainforest...
I mean, this is a really good way to get somebody hurt. You got a quarterback that is just lining his receivers up for the slaughter and then you have an offensive line that can't block, running backs that can't block, even the fullback just misses blocking assignments all over, the current left tackle makes Levi Brown look like Tarik Glenn...and even a simple stunt is enough to throw the whole line into confusion and someone comes through untouched...I've never seen a team lineup two tight ends in the back field to help with pass protection like that before...between the piss poor blocking and the brutal quarterback, the Cardinals are a danger to themselves, they're gonna get somebody seriously hurt with this combination...



Dickie Dunn wrote:If the NFL ever follows through with this ridiculous idea, the London Silly Nannies are going to be a scrub team filled with scrub players trying to hang on to their dying NFL careers. After a couple years of a watching a crap team maybe then the idea of the NFL in London will finally die.

Dickie Dunn wrote:http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/31/olympic-stadium-emerges-as-possible-location-for-nfl-in-london/
I, along with nearly everyone who isn't an NFL owner, hate all this London crap. I wait for it to just go away, but it seems like the idea just progresses further and further. One thing that seems to be left out of any conversation about the NFL in London is the players. I saw Teddy Bruschi talking about this before the season started, but it still largely ignored. Players don't want to live in London. Players don't want to play in London. Free agents aren't going to sign to play in London. Draft picks with leverage are going to Eli Manning their way out of going to London. If the NFL ever follows through with this ridiculous idea, the London Silly Nannies are going to be a scrub team filled with scrub players trying to hang on to their dying NFL careers. After a couple years of a watching a crap team maybe then the idea of the NFL in London will finally die.

JS© wrote:Dickie Dunn wrote:If the NFL ever follows through with this ridiculous idea, the London Silly Nannies are going to be a scrub team filled with scrub players trying to hang on to their dying NFL careers. After a couple years of a watching a crap team maybe then the idea of the NFL in London will finally die.
I can see the Sillie Nannies being former first round busts, some average players who get overpaid, and a few long-time vets trying to milk a London vacation at the end of their career.

JS© wrote:I can see the Sillie Nannies being former first round busts, some average players who get overpaid, and a few long-time vets trying to milk a London vacation at the end of their career.










MRandall25 wrote:I don't think replacement refs was necessarily a bad idea on the league's part.
Would you rather not have had football until the refs' lockout was settled?

Godric wrote:MRandall25 wrote:I don't think replacement refs was necessarily a bad idea on the league's part.
Would you rather not have had football until the refs' lockout was settled?
It wasn't a lockout it was a strike and the owners should have just paid them in the first place




Users browsing this forum: Cagsjr724, Gabe, Nuge, PghSkins, Shyster, SolidSnake and 3 guests