Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf

pittsoccer33 wrote:96% Mitt







shafnutz05 wrote:Troy Loney wrote:What is the Libretarian view on immigration?
http://www.lp.org/issues/immigration


Troy Loney wrote:shafnutz05 wrote:Troy Loney wrote:What is the Libretarian view on immigration?
http://www.lp.org/issues/immigration
Definitely didn't agree with them on that.


Troy Loney wrote:I have no problem with immigrants coming to this country to work, one we have an aging demographic in this country, and there's nothing worse for an economy than a workforce stuck supporting the elderly.


Gaucho wrote:So is it safe to say that most of you are unhappy with the two-party system?

Gaucho wrote:So is it safe to say that most of you are unhappy with the two-party system?

Gaucho wrote:So is it safe to say that most of you are unhappy with the two-party system?

columbia wrote:My guess is that this thread will be liquidated faster than you can say Bain Capital.

pittsoccer33 wrote:Gaucho wrote:So is it safe to say that most of you are unhappy with the two-party system?
I just don't see how any other way would possibly work - just imagine if all these little factions and caucuses became their own political parties. You would see the various coalitions team up to get the thing they all support passed.
Each issue essentially has two sides - for or against. The common sense positions usually lie in the middle, but ultimately you are still for or against something.

pittsoccer33 wrote:Gaucho wrote:So is it safe to say that most of you are unhappy with the two-party system?
I just don't see how any other way would possibly work - just imagine if all these little factions and caucuses became their own political parties. You would see the various coalitions team up to get the thing they all support passed.
Each issue essentially has two sides - for or against. The common sense positions usually lie in the middle, but ultimately you are still for or against something.

pittsoccer33 wrote:
Each issue essentially has two sides - for or against. The common sense positions usually lie in the middle, but ultimately you are still for or against something.

How do you get rid of it?MRandall25 wrote:[If you get rid of a two-party system, you would (theoretically) get rid of the "vote for the lesser of two evils" problem that we seem to be running into every four years.


pittsoccer33 wrote: Those generations seem to be more annoyed by social issues than passionate about them.

pittsoccer33 wrote:Those generations seem to be more annoyed by social issues than passionate about them.

Users browsing this forum: GaryRissling and 3 guests