Gaucho wrote:
Yes, it seems that many self-appointed libertarians feel that way.
Are there any other kind?
Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
Gaucho wrote:
Yes, it seems that many self-appointed libertarians feel that way.


Gaucho wrote:pittsoccer33 wrote:
Each issue essentially has two sides - for or against. The common sense positions usually lie in the middle, but ultimately you are still for or against something.
That's a way too simplistic way to look at things, imo.





Kraftster wrote:It boggles my mind that there are not more fiscally conservative/socially liberal voters. I guess its a product of the two-party system for our entire lives -- people seem to align themselves with their party of choice in lock step.

Kraftster wrote:It boggles my mind that there are not more fiscally conservative/socially liberal voters. I guess its a product of the two-party system for our entire lives -- people seem to align themselves with their party of choice in lock step.

Sarcastic wrote:By that, I mean, so many uneducated, unskilled, people around at once.

Kraftster wrote:It boggles my mind that there are not more fiscally conservative/socially liberal voters. I guess its a product of the two-party system for our entire lives -- people seem to align themselves with their party of choice in lock step.


Gaucho wrote:Bad wording, I guess.

llipgh2 wrote:First a little background.
http://mashable.com/2012/10/13/isidewith-vote/
And the quiz itself.
http://www.isidewith.com/
Apparently, I side with Jill Stein, the Green candidate. (94%)
I also sided to a lesser extent with Obama (84%) and Rocky Andersen, the Justice candidate (who I have never heard of - 75%)
I did not side at all with Romney. HA!
Kraftster wrote:It boggles my mind that there are not more fiscally conservative/socially liberal voters. I guess its a product of the two-party system for our entire lives -- people seem to align themselves with their party of choice in lock step.

Godric wrote:Gaucho wrote:Bad wording, I guess.
i'm still thinking about what you meant to get across...
I'd imagine from your perspective it may seem like there is a lot of emerging/converting LIBs in the last couple years.
Is this what you were trying to touch on?


Gaucho wrote:What tif said. Also that people sometimes seem to be libertarian only on certain issues. Making them not really that libertarian at all, I guess.

Gaucho wrote:What tif said. Also that people sometimes seem to be libertarian only on certain issues. Making them not really that libertarian at all, I guess.


MRandall25 wrote:Gaucho wrote:What tif said. Also that people sometimes seem to be libertarian only on certain issues. Making them not really that libertarian at all, I guess.
It works the same way with the two major parties, though.

Godric wrote:Gaucho wrote:What tif said. Also that people sometimes seem to be libertarian only on certain issues. Making them not really that libertarian at all, I guess.
I don't deal in Absolutes

Gaucho wrote:Godric wrote:Gaucho wrote:What tif said. Also that people sometimes seem to be libertarian only on certain issues. Making them not really that libertarian at all, I guess.
I don't deal in Absolutes
At your age you're supposed to deal in nothing else.


Godric wrote:Gaucho wrote:Godric wrote:Gaucho wrote:What tif said. Also that people sometimes seem to be libertarian only on certain issues. Making them not really that libertarian at all, I guess.
I don't deal in Absolutes
At your age you're supposed to deal in nothing else.
I disagree

Gaucho wrote:Godric wrote:Gaucho wrote:Godric wrote:Gaucho wrote:What tif said. Also that people sometimes seem to be libertarian only on certain issues. Making them not really that libertarian at all, I guess.
I don't deal in Absolutes
At your age you're supposed to deal in nothing else.
I disagree
See what I mean?



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests