Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf

pittsoccer33 wrote:Mr. Colby wrote:The pyramids weren't that hard to build... all they had to do was get like 150 people to pull the stone across a lubricated surface and then up ramps that they simply changed the angle of in order to get the next stone up
please explain how you could cut, transport, and place each of the two ton stones every 9 seconds.


redwill wrote:What I find fun is ... let's assume that time-travel is possible sometime in the future. If someone comes back in time and changes history, we wouldn't know it, would we? We would just have our normal memories like we always do. But those memories are tied to history, which is being changed. The instant our history is changed by time-travel, our entire personal history is changed, without us knowing it.
Assuming time-travel in the future and future-folk changing history, we could have lived a million different lives in just the last few minutes. History changing in a flashing kaleidoscope that we can't see because we're in the kaleidoscope itself.
... If that makes sense.


DocEmrick wrote:Watch the movie Primer, it explains everything in the language of science and math

Mr. Colby wrote:pittsoccer33 wrote:Mr. Colby wrote:The pyramids weren't that hard to build... all they had to do was get like 150 people to pull the stone across a lubricated surface and then up ramps that they simply changed the angle of in order to get the next stone up
please explain how you could cut, transport, and place each of the two ton stones every 9 seconds.
why every 9 seconds i don't get it?


Rylan wrote:I honestly think we do live thousands / millions of lives. I don't think fantasies are anything more than a glimpse into another life of ours



Rylan wrote: I don't think fantasies are anything more than a glimpse into another life of ours


Tico Rick wrote:Yes, but once the future people have gone back into the past and successfully changed history, they would have eliminated their reason for going back to the past, and thus would not have made the trip, which would keep the past the same as it had been.



Pucks_and_Pols wrote:Now: if you can manage to break down a human mass, disintegrate it into a near weightless state, propel it through time and space, and somehow put it back together at its destination, you just might be onto something there.

shafnutz05 wrote:I don't think time travel is the ultimate answer. We need to develop a way where we can experience history by being sucked into our home satellite dishes and placed in the time period of the program we are watching.


shafnutz05 wrote:For the (very few I'm sure) people that did not get my reference:Spoiler:





Gaucho wrote:Problem with travelling into the past is there would be no way you could not in some way change it. Butterfly wings and all that.

shafnutz05 wrote:Gaucho wrote:Problem with travelling into the past is there would be no way you could not in some way change it. Butterfly wings and all that.
I think the Butterfly Effect theory is crap, but that's just me. If you do something significant (murder someone), of course that will change the course of history on a noticeable level, and will probably branch out to multiple lives. If you step on a bug, nothing is going to be different.

shafnutz05 wrote:Gaucho wrote:Problem with travelling into the past is there would be no way you could not in some way change it. Butterfly wings and all that.
I think the Butterfly Effect theory is crap, but that's just me. If you do something significant (murder someone), of course that will change the course of history on a noticeable level, and will probably branch out to multiple lives. If you step on a bug, nothing is going to be different.

Users browsing this forum: GaryRissling, llipgh2 and 5 guests