Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf





the wicked child wrote:I think Sony is looking into the same kind of thing. I think it's absolutely terrible. I think it will actually hurt game sales overall, tbh. If I am stuck with a $60 game, I am only going to buy the absolute slam dunks. I think it will have an adverse effect on the price of older games as well. Just a terrible idea.






thepittman wrote:I've never sold or traded in a game, so it's a none issue to me.



Malkamaniac wrote:I've only bought the games that I consider slam dunks for myself. This only reduces my want to buy games that I feel would be a reach for my preference.
This could benefit the players because companies can't pump out the same crap if people become even more aware of how good/receptive a game is.
Although if games go to 70-80 a game. I start wondering if I can afford that at all even. Especially if that doesn't include the DLC every game has to have now.

Idoit40fans wrote:NAN is still like 5 generations behind, this will probably never affect him.


Idoit40fans wrote:Nice...but just like everything else, Nintende will catch up like 5-8 years later and add this next generation.

newarenanow wrote:thepittman wrote:I've never sold or traded in a game, so it's a none issue to me.
I think the last game I traded was Mega Man III for Blaster Master back in like 5th grade.

FreeCandy44 wrote:newarenanow wrote:thepittman wrote:I've never sold or traded in a game, so it's a none issue to me.
I think the last game I traded was Mega Man III for Blaster Master back in like 5th grade.
Isn't Master Blaster worth a more then a few dollars now?





Users browsing this forum: adambpsu, GaryRissling and 4 guests