Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf


Orlando Penguin wrote:I haven't seen Neal's play yet but didn't he get a fine/1-gamer earlier this season for a highly-questionable high-sticking incident earlier this season?

Orlando Penguin wrote:Shanaban has lost all credibility to me after his non-action to Weber in Game 1 of the Wings-Preds series. He gave Hagelin 3 games which is the right move and should have been what Weber got. But I guess if you're a star and not a 3rd-pair D-man grinder, then you get the benefit of the doubt. Asham will get a game simply because it was a match penalty with intent to injure, despite the location of the crosscheck contact. I haven't seen Neal's play yet but didn't he get a fine/1-gamer earlier this season for a highly-questionable high-sticking incident earlier this season?




bhaw wrote:Orlando Penguin wrote:Shanaban has lost all credibility to me after his non-action to Weber in Game 1 of the Wings-Preds series. He gave Hagelin 3 games which is the right move and should have been what Weber got. But I guess if you're a star and not a 3rd-pair D-man grinder, then you get the benefit of the doubt. Asham will get a game simply because it was a match penalty with intent to injure, despite the location of the crosscheck contact. I haven't seen Neal's play yet but didn't he get a fine/1-gamer earlier this season for a highly-questionable high-sticking incident earlier this season?
I am not 100% sure that they take regular season issues into account for playoffs. Shanahan made some idiotic comment several weeks ago that he treats them different because every playoff series is basically the equivalent of a full season. So a 3 game suspension, per his own words, is the equivalent of 35ish games.

spiritfan wrote:It's comming and everyone should not act surprised when it happens... a player is gonna get very seriously injured or worse yet killed on the ice... Shanny is a sham and the rest of league officials are a joke... sports leagues think they are above the law... very unfortunate

Staggy wrote:bhaw wrote:Orlando Penguin wrote:Shanaban has lost all credibility to me after his non-action to Weber in Game 1 of the Wings-Preds series. He gave Hagelin 3 games which is the right move and should have been what Weber got. But I guess if you're a star and not a 3rd-pair D-man grinder, then you get the benefit of the doubt. Asham will get a game simply because it was a match penalty with intent to injure, despite the location of the crosscheck contact. I haven't seen Neal's play yet but didn't he get a fine/1-gamer earlier this season for a highly-questionable high-sticking incident earlier this season?
I am not 100% sure that they take regular season issues into account for playoffs. Shanahan made some idiotic comment several weeks ago that he treats them different because every playoff series is basically the equivalent of a full season. So a 3 game suspension, per his own words, is the equivalent of 35ish games.
Oh nice, solid 92 game suspension of Cooke then, Shanny (or was it still Campbell back then? can't remember)


It's true though. You'd think, maybe if they did that with other players, I'd actually have an effect.




Biggest difference between them is head injury and concussion on one and no injury on the other




Mr. Colby wrote:Torres is going to get a big suspension and that sucks because that hit was not that bad at all. Just because Hossa got seriously injured doesn't make it any worse. He reached for the puck with his head down.
Torres did leave his feet and it was charging, but from my view he didn't make head contact.
It was a late hit by league standards, and while the NHL does measure hits with their eyes in terms of a feel, they also measure it in terms of time and I'm sure this will be deemed a late hit.
Torres launched himself into Hossa. It was not a hit straight through the way that Dustin Brown hit Henrik Sedin in the Vancouver-LA game. There was a launch, and the principle point of contact was the head. In addition to that, there was a significant injury on the play and the player in question is somebody who has a history as a repeat offender.
Torres has a checkered past and when they go through the criteria of Rule 48, he meets them all. He's going to be suspended, and I suspect it's going to be an in person hearing with a significant number.
Mr. Colby wrote:but from my view he didn't make head contact.





shafnutz05 wrote:Yeah, I don't care where the initial contact was. The fact is, Torres hit him WAY late (probably a full two seconds after he skated away from the puck, launched himself a foot into the air, and boom. It was a dirty, late hit that resulted in injury.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests