Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf




Mr. Colby wrote:Who is lindy rupp?



SolidSnake wrote:The same could be asked for Larry Trotz


sluggermatt15 wrote:The fans love him, he used to play for the team, and Ruff honestly has done a nice job with the talent the Sabres have (not a lot compared to other teams). Only year where they really choked was in 2005-2006 against Ottawa in the playoffs. Buffalo should have won the Cup that year.



PghSkins wrote:Dan Frylsma will not be around nearly as long.




penmyst wrote:Does anybody in Buffalo give a %#@* about hockey?
I'm serious. I don't know if they do or not. If they didn't, maybe that's why nobody cares that he's won nothing. If they DO care about hockey, then I have no answer.



Mongoose87 wrote:It's cheaper to pay on coach for fairly consistent results, than to hire and fire coaches and have a roller coaster.

bhaw wrote:Mongoose87 wrote:It's cheaper to pay on coach for fairly consistent results, than to hire and fire coaches and have a roller coaster.
Yeah, my original reaction was the the Sabers are treated more like a business than most franchises. Seems like he has expectations for each year laid out in front of them and is hitting those expectations more often than not. He's also one of those guys who seems to float between player coach and disciplinarian as needed. Most coaches are one or the other, so when that message wears off, they need to go. As long as Ruff can manage between the two, he can keep the team with him.


Mr. Colby wrote:bhaw wrote:Mongoose87 wrote:It's cheaper to pay on coach for fairly consistent results, than to hire and fire coaches and have a roller coaster.
Yeah, my original reaction was the the Sabers are treated more like a business than most franchises. Seems like he has expectations for each year laid out in front of them and is hitting those expectations more often than not. He's also one of those guys who seems to float between player coach and disciplinarian as needed. Most coaches are one or the other, so when that message wears off, they need to go. As long as Ruff can manage between the two, he can keep the team with him.
More teams should do that... a lot of coach firings are not really necessary. What did Columbus expect this year? At the beginning of the year they had injury problems and no goaltending, so they dug themselves into a hole that only snowballed from there. Not sure what a new coach is going to do for them.

guiner wrote:Its always been my impression that Larry Rupp has produced pretty good results with marginal talent because of low salary constraints.

Mr. Colby wrote:bhaw wrote:Mongoose87 wrote:It's cheaper to pay on coach for fairly consistent results, than to hire and fire coaches and have a roller coaster.
Yeah, my original reaction was the the Sabers are treated more like a business than most franchises. Seems like he has expectations for each year laid out in front of them and is hitting those expectations more often than not. He's also one of those guys who seems to float between player coach and disciplinarian as needed. Most coaches are one or the other, so when that message wears off, they need to go. As long as Ruff can manage between the two, he can keep the team with him.
More teams should do that... a lot of coach firings are not really necessary. What did Columbus expect this year? At the beginning of the year they had injury problems and no goaltending, so they dug themselves into a hole that only snowballed from there. Not sure what a new coach is going to do for them.

penmyst wrote:Does anybody in Buffalo give a %#@* about hockey?
I'm serious. I don't know if they do or not. If they didn't, maybe that's why nobody cares that he's won nothing. If they DO care about hockey, then I have no answer.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest