Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf


Be1isarius89 wrote:Mike Green not a top 10 defenseman? Find me another defenseman who can score 30 goals and put up a point per game. Sure. He's not great defensively(Their are worse players than him), but that's not what he's paid to do. When healthy, he is the most prolific offensive defenseman in the league. Easily top 10.

MRandall25 wrote:Be1isarius89 wrote:Mike Green not a top 10 defenseman? Find me another defenseman who can score 30 goals and put up a point per game. Sure. He's not great defensively(Their are worse players than him), but that's not what he's paid to do. When healthy, he is the most prolific offensive defenseman in the league. Easily top 10.
To me, doesn't matter if you can score 5 goals if you're letting 10 in the other way.

npv708 wrote:MRandall25 wrote:Be1isarius89 wrote:Mike Green not a top 10 defenseman? Find me another defenseman who can score 30 goals and put up a point per game. Sure. He's not great defensively(Their are worse players than him), but that's not what he's paid to do. When healthy, he is the most prolific offensive defenseman in the league. Easily top 10.
To me, doesn't matter if you can score 5 goals if you're letting 10 in the other way.
But he's not, which is why your argument is bonkers. CSNDC even had a graphic showing how the caps GAA is lower with Green playing.




MRandall25 wrote:Mike Green is a product of a PP that has Ovechkin, Backstrom, and Semin.
18 of those goals were on the PP.
The fact you're comparing him to the all-time greats is an insult to them. All of the guys mentioned are 100 fold better DEFENSEMEN than Mike Green.
This isn't even about him being on the Capitals. I could care less. IMO he's not good.

MRandall25 wrote:npv708 wrote:MRandall25 wrote:Be1isarius89 wrote:Mike Green not a top 10 defenseman? Find me another defenseman who can score 30 goals and put up a point per game. Sure. He's not great defensively(Their are worse players than him), but that's not what he's paid to do. When healthy, he is the most prolific offensive defenseman in the league. Easily top 10.
To me, doesn't matter if you can score 5 goals if you're letting 10 in the other way.
But he's not, which is why your argument is bonkers. CSNDC even had a graphic showing how the caps GAA is lower with Green playing.
Correlation =/= causation.
I'm assuming they took that from this year?
The Caps aren't the same team now they were earlier.

itissteeltime wrote:MRandall25 wrote:Mike Green is a product of a PP that has Ovechkin, Backstrom, and Semin.
18 of those goals were on the PP.
The fact you're comparing him to the all-time greats is an insult to them. All of the guys mentioned are 100 fold better DEFENSEMEN than Mike Green.
This isn't even about him being on the Capitals. I could care less. IMO he's not good.
Maybe Ovi is a product of Green, considering he sucks now.
I watch every caps game when the Pens arent on. I live in DC so that's what I get. I think Green is incredibly average defensively, and top 2 or 3 (maybe 1) offensively, which makes him an awesome player whose position happens to be "defense."


Be1isarius89 wrote:Glad the point I made went right over your head......

Kraftster wrote:MRandall25 wrote:Spoiler:They were solid, all around D-men.Spoiler:
Not Phil Housley.




Be1isarius89 wrote:Goals are goals. I don't care how he scored them. I just he know he scored 31 and that's something very few defenseman have ever done.
As a side note, my list contained the top 10 defensemen in points all time. Hence the exclusion of Hatcher and Wilson....

Be1isarius89 wrote:51% of Niklas Lidstrom's 1138 career points have come on the powerplay including 50% of his 263 goals. What does it matter if points are scored on the powerplay? They count in the game. That's all that matters to me.

MRandall25 wrote:Be1isarius89 wrote:51% of Niklas Lidstrom's 1138 career points have come on the powerplay including 50% of his 263 goals. What does it matter if points are scored on the powerplay? They count in the game. That's all that matters to me.
We aren't talking career stats, don't change the argument.
Also, even comparing Lidstrom to Green is a huge insult to Lidstrom.

Be1isarius89 wrote:MRandall25 wrote:Be1isarius89 wrote:51% of Niklas Lidstrom's 1138 career points have come on the powerplay including 50% of his 263 goals. What does it matter if points are scored on the powerplay? They count in the game. That's all that matters to me.
We aren't talking career stats, don't change the argument.
Also, even comparing Lidstrom to Green is a huge insult to Lidstrom.
Because I'm obviously comparing their all around games. We're talking strictly offense. And only 46% of Greens career points have come on the powerplay. Just so we get that straight.
Only 2 defensemen have scored 30 goals in the last 20 years. Green and Hatcher. Mike Green has already had 2 seasons averaging more than 1 point per game.
This league hasn't seen a defenseman put up points like Green since the early 90's



MRandall25 wrote:Be1isarius89 wrote:MRandall25 wrote:Be1isarius89 wrote:51% of Niklas Lidstrom's 1138 career points have come on the powerplay including 50% of his 263 goals. What does it matter if points are scored on the powerplay? They count in the game. That's all that matters to me.
We aren't talking career stats, don't change the argument.
Also, even comparing Lidstrom to Green is a huge insult to Lidstrom.
Because I'm obviously comparing their all around games. We're talking strictly offense. And only 46% of Greens career points have come on the powerplay. Just so we get that straight.
Only 2 defensemen have scored 30 goals in the last 20 years. Green and Hatcher. Mike Green has already had 2 seasons averaging more than 1 point per game.
This league hasn't seen a defenseman put up points like Green since the early 90's
I'll counter that with "None of those d-men were on a team with a line of Ovechkin-Backstrom-Semin when they were actually good"

Users browsing this forum: offsides and 5 guests