Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf




pressure=9Pa wrote:Agree, but I'd argue it took too long to get here. Without Comcast's purchase of NBC, we still wouldn't be here.

pressure=9Pa wrote:Agree, but I'd argue it took too long to get here. Without Comcast's purchase of NBC, we still wouldn't be here.


orpchar wrote:Pro: Gary Bettman got the NHL on NBC Networks, where they are getting more exposure than they ever would on ESPN.
Con: Nickelback playing at the awards ceremony!? Really?!?!

Stick_licker wrote:I'm torn on this. I agree that we get to see more games on NBC and Co. then we would on ESPN, but Millbury, pierre mcguire and roenick are a hefty price to pay. I don't understand who thinks that these clowns are worthy of NBC's "A team" (i.e. the sunday afternoon games that are nationally televised). I suspect that ESPN would have better analysts (I actually think Melrose is pretty decent).
I just can't fathom why NBC trots out the same horrible analysts / between the bench clown every game. Is there nothing we can do as fans to fix this?
I preferred when Versus was its own entity and not NBC channel #2353. They played a ton of games, were a niche channel for the "oddball sports" and had decent analysts if I recall correctly.





Users browsing this forum: the wicked child and 1 guest