Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf





Idoit40fans wrote:Its not like they even took their time with him. He was a starter at 23.




tfrizz wrote:Idoit40fans wrote:Its not like they even took their time with him. He was a starter at 23.
That's still "taking their time" compared to the Pens with Fleury, Canadiens with Price, Blue Jackets with Mason, and so on.
I'm a big believer in goalies not becoming NHL starters until their mid-20, btw. It gives them time to refine their technique, and to develop their mental game.

tfrizz wrote:Idoit40fans wrote:Its not like they even took their time with him. He was a starter at 23.
That's still "taking their time" compared to the Pens with Fleury, Canadiens with Price, Blue Jackets with Mason, and so on.
I'm a big believer in goalies not becoming NHL starters until their mid-20, btw. It gives them time to refine their technique, and to develop their mental game.

tfrizz wrote:Idoit40fans wrote:Its not like they even took their time with him. He was a starter at 23.
That's still "taking their time" compared to the Pens with Fleury, Canadiens with Price, Blue Jackets with Mason, and so on.
I'm a big believer in goalies not becoming NHL starters until their mid-20, btw. It gives them time to refine their technique, and to develop their mental game.


Idoit40fans wrote:I'm not sure that he's saying Fleury was rushed, just that he was up here almost immediately.

canaan wrote:Idoit40fans wrote:I'm not sure that he's saying Fleury was rushed, just that he was up here almost immediately.
"not soon enough" -eddie olczyk

llipgh2 wrote:canaan wrote:Idoit40fans wrote:I'm not sure that he's saying Fleury was rushed, just that he was up here almost immediately.
"not soon enough" -eddie olczyk
Dang, I was going to post an Eddie O joke...

Users browsing this forum: JS© and 2 guests