the wicked child wrote:Mr. Hall may get to star in another video soon.
Yep, hearing today on that hit.

Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
the wicked child wrote:Mr. Hall may get to star in another video soon.



shmenguin wrote:Tim Thomasen wrote:Cal Clutterbuck got nailed by Taylor Hall. Not looking good as the team had to help him off the ice.
Quick tangent on Taylor Hall...I looked up his numbers and his even strength scoring is at about .5ppg over the last few years. That's the Tyler Kennedy zone. I never watch him play, so in relation to the typical #1 overall pick, what are this guys strengths, aside from what shows up on the box score?



Gaucho wrote:Damn, I totall read that in Pierre's voice and can't stop laughing.

shmenguin wrote:over the last few years since he "broke out" parise seems to me like a master of execution when he's in scoring positons. he simply gets it done whenever he has the chance. is this one of the disconnects between him and hall at the moment?

llipgh2 wrote:Gaucho wrote:Damn, I totall read that in Pierre's voice and can't stop laughing.
As much as PeeAir annoys me, the man does know his hockey. I wish he just wasn't so freaking annoying while sharing his knowledge.






Rylan wrote:Pierre just gets too narrow focused some games and doesn't break from that focus. 2.5 hours of hearing emphasis on certain people or plays gets really really old. Otherwise, Pierre is generally one of my favorite analysts, but Wednesday night it was becoming unbearable.


Rylan wrote:That is a problem often times. I get that hockey is probably one of the most complicated sports to pick-up due to the speed and rules. But, sometimes it gets really frustrating hearing the same things over and over. I just wish there was more analysis aside from the basics. Hell, its even hard to find good reading online about hockey that isn't laced with severe bias.


Rylan wrote:That is a problem often times. I get that hockey is probably one of the most complicated sports to pick-up due to the speed and rules. But, sometimes it gets really frustrating hearing the same things over and over. I just wish there was more analysis aside from the basics. Hell, its even hard to find good reading online about hockey that isn't laced with severe bias.










Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest