Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
i dunno, i thought it was kind of a fun coincidence
dagny wrote:The plot thickens on that no goal by the rags. The ref went to the scorer's table and asked about a review. The ref was told they reviewed it upstairs, twice, and it was inconclusive. Rather than reviewing it some more, or in Toronto, the ref took their word for it and play continued. Had they taken more time, it would have been ruled a goal.
DelPen wrote:dagny wrote:The plot thickens on that no goal by the rags. The ref went to the scorer's table and asked about a review. The ref was told they reviewed it upstairs, twice, and it was inconclusive. Rather than reviewing it some more, or in Toronto, the ref took their word for it and play continued. Had they taken more time, it would have been ruled a goal.
The Rags guys also said since Walkom was in the building they don't even go to Toronto, it's done with him in the replay booth at the arena.
But the way they are going on about it it's like it's the first goal the Rags ever scored that got waived off where we were having one goal by Malkin per game for a while there.
dagny wrote:Holweg... meet Kharma. . .
68forever wrote:dagny wrote:Holweg... meet Kharma. . .
not to complain but why was that not a penalty??? if that was Sid or one of our players we would be screaming foul. so can someone please explain to me why it wasn't called. Thank you.
Ron` wrote:A while back someone was complaining about MAF playing the puck. That he doesn't do it enough. Well he should do it less in my opinion. He just set that whole Ranger pressure up by passing past his player to the Ranger point man. Only a good play by Talbot eventually bailed him out.
DelPen wrote:68forever wrote:dagny wrote:Holweg... meet Kharma. . .
not to complain but why was that not a penalty??? if that was Sid or one of our players we would be screaming foul. so can someone please explain to me why it wasn't called. Thank you.
Because the refs blow, it goes both ways, this time we lucked out on their inetpness.
DelPen wrote:68forever wrote:dagny wrote:Holweg... meet Kharma. . .
not to complain but why was that not a penalty??? if that was Sid or one of our players we would be screaming foul. so can someone please explain to me why it wasn't called. Thank you.
Because the refs blow, it goes both ways, this time we lucked out on their inetpness.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests