Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf



wallflower wrote:twc and I were discussing this same idea last night.

Corvidae wrote:wallflower wrote:twc and I were discussing this same idea last night.
i iz in ur brain, nomin' ur IDers







bhaw wrote:I think people need to be patient. I mean, we have people complaining in the current game after an hour or two. Life happens. Just because someone has time right now doesn't mean something won't come up to hold them back and extra few hours.
The point of the game isn't to be done in 2 days.

jaysmiter wrote:bhaw wrote:I think people need to be patient. I mean, we have people complaining in the current game after an hour or two. Life happens. Just because someone has time right now doesn't mean something won't come up to hold them back and extra few hours.
The point of the game isn't to be done in 2 days.
I agree with the patience thing, but I also don't think 12 hours to send in a PM is necessary. I just think that's a bit long. I'm thinking 6 hours is long enough for 4 people to send in a PM.
I also agree with Pavel...I sign up to play the game knowing the rules in advance. If I didn't want to play with that long of a time limit, I wouldn't play. I don't think I've ever complained about the RPs in the game thread, and I'm not really complaining now. Just stating what I would do. It doesn't really bother me either way. If the RPs take their sweet time, it at least gets me off the computer and doing something productive while I wait.


Pavel Bure wrote:Again I say everyone knows time limits at the start of games. They aren't secret. If you sign up for a game you know what the time limits are. If you don't like the limits then don't play. Most of all don't complain about a game's time limits that you are not running. It's bad form, not to mention as a RPer it's their right to take right up to the deadline if they wish again because these limits were set before the game was started and everyone that signed up for the game agreed on the set limits.

jaysmiter wrote:OK...then don't play in or take a role in a game that has a lower time limit.
Complaining about a lower time limit is the same as complaining about a higher time limit.

bhaw wrote:jaysmiter wrote:OK...then don't play in or take a role in a game that has a lower time limit.
Complaining about a lower time limit is the same as complaining about a higher time limit.
I probably won't. Just saying that lower limits means your penalizing people for having life happen.



jaysmiter wrote:ok

bhaw wrote:jaysmiter wrote:ok
fine then.
I'll also say that reducing the time is a much bigger detriment to the bad guys than the good guys. It's going to take a lot of strategy out of the game, IMO.

Well, don't worry...I have plans on how to even things out...but if the team of bad guys needs 12 hours to form a strategy for that night...those are some pisspoor bad guys.


dagny wrote:Ahem.... enough bickering.
Remember what I said about HAVING FUN?!
You WILL have FUN in this forum, and you'll like it!

bhaw wrote:dagny wrote:Ahem.... enough bickering.
Remember what I said about HAVING FUN?!
You WILL have FUN in this forum, and you'll like it!
I'm trying... I just don't understand why it's wrong to have a dissenting opinion about the "slow" rps. I thought I pointing out pretty valid things about this game not being anyone's life priority and that 6 hours is pretty easy for someone in college to sleep through after a night of drinking or for someone to not be around if they have to head out unexpectedly.


Corvidae wrote:Time Wars?! Stop bhaw! I'm the Einstein and my equations show that he's a Langolier!

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests