Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
netwolf wrote:FAMILY BOARD!No disclaimer or nothing. Now I see why you are no longer Amish Peter. You must have been shunned.
Ginger wrote:Pitts wrote:"There was inappropriate activity between him and the mannequin."
Just what was that mannequin doing???
She was a seductive wench with lots of joints.
Kicksave wrote:This is where I lost it...
"If convicted, Plentyhorse may be registered as a sex offender."
HE WAS HAVING SEX WITH A MANNEQUIN! This kid is going to grow up, have a family and children and people are going to have to know that hes a sex offender...because he HAD SEX WITH A MANNEQUIN! Talk about damaging a guys reputation for something as retarded as this. I can see a fine or maybe a weekend in jail for having done it in a public place but putting him on a list with rapist and childmolesters is going WAY to far.
ExPatriatePen wrote:Hope Matchan, of the prosecutors' department, said: "People might say it's relatively harmless.
"But I certainly would want to know if this person was my neighbour."
Ahhhhh.. I'll bet you would hope, I'll bet you would...![]()
![]()
![]()
She never compained or talked back and...
You'd always know exactly where to find her
Even though she spent a lot of time in stores - she didn't ever spend any money
She always kept a PERFECT figure and...
You could put her in all kind of positions.To be absolutely clear here, I'm speaking of the mannequin, not Hope
JS© wrote:but which is worse:
Getting caught with a mannequin, or getting caught with a dirty goat and being forced to marry it?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/4748292.stm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests