Gaucho wrote:marek wrote:I'm listening online... Was that goal high glove side again on fleury?
Would you feel vindicated if it were?
LMAO
Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
Gaucho wrote:marek wrote:I'm listening online... Was that goal high glove side again on fleury?
Would you feel vindicated if it were?
MRandall25 wrote:marek wrote:I'm listening online... Was that goal high glove side again on fleury?
It caught him below the armpit... Regardless, it's Tomas Vanek shooting. That guy can pick spots like no one's business.
Gaucho wrote:marek wrote:I'm listening online... Was that goal high glove side again on fleury?
Would you feel vindicated if it were?
malksby8771 wrote:marek wrote:I'm listening online... Was that goal high glove side again on fleury?
It wasn't high but it was his glove side. It was all Orpik's fault though as he was way too far back on Vanek and gave him the lane. Bad week for Orpik for sure.
PghSkins wrote:malksby8771 wrote:marek wrote:I'm listening online... Was that goal high glove side again on fleury?
It wasn't high but it was his glove side. It was all Orpik's fault though as he was way too far back on Vanek and gave him the lane. Bad week for Orpik for sure.
Still Fleury's fault. It's illegal on this board to blame anyone else for a goal against.
npv708 wrote:Especially when he has less pressure than Neptune's third moon.
MRandall25 wrote:PghSkins wrote:malksby8771 wrote:marek wrote:I'm listening online... Was that goal high glove side again on fleury?
It wasn't high but it was his glove side. It was all Orpik's fault though as he was way too far back on Vanek and gave him the lane. Bad week for Orpik for sure.
Still Fleury's fault. It's illegal on this board to blame anyone else for a goal against.
Imagine if it were Johnson in net
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests