Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf


relantel wrote:redwill wrote:TheHammer24 wrote:Indeed, it's remarkable we made it this far.
No ****. That's what everyone is saying. Take the compliment.
like I said in the dead thread - one can play a great game and still die.
Sometimes luck plays a role. I think had we been playing a limit game, the post-columbia vote portion of the game would have been different. The extra time helped us, as it went from a bandwagon vote to having some thought and changes involved. We weren't certain columbia was blue. But I didn't think all of the reds would have piled on him even if he was. So I pulled back during a rare (for me) phone session.

MWB wrote:TheHammer24 wrote:Sam's Drunk Dog wrote:Nan, pfidc, hammer, why did you elect MWB to be sheriff instead of one of your own?
Also, was it luck that you chose MWB night one?
I "figured" out Kraftster and Rel, but MWB was pure chance. Just shot for a good player.
NAN's advice for being red was play like you're blue. I took you at your word that the sheriff was only going to break tie votes (and thus I determined it wasn't that meaningful), so if I were blue, I would have wanted to make sure I gave it to a good guy. MWB was the only guy we knew was good at this point, so I lobbied for him.
The other thing that was kind of suspicious about you was when you went MIA after the pfidc kill. We were surprised by the lack of discussion about that and about how rel and I both avoided kills.

columbia wrote:It didn't matter if the red were NAN or canaan.
The village would have just killed the other in the day phase.





TheHammer24 wrote:Yeah, I legit went out last night and was hungover this morning. I searched my posts, and wished I had participated more. There were a couple times where I wanted to say something but didn't so maybe you did pick up on those instances.

newarenanow wrote:I think the columbia vote was where we started to unravel too. We played it like it was a limit vote, but then SDD was sick and said the time was extended indefinitely and so a ton of discussion started.

Sam's Drunk Dog wrote:TheHammer24 wrote:Yeah, I legit went out last night and was hungover this morning. I searched my posts, and wished I had participated more. There were a couple times where I wanted to say something but didn't so maybe you did pick up on those instances.
I tried to incorporate your drinking story into the write up for your death.


newarenanow wrote:I think the columbia vote was where we started to unravel too. We played it like it was a limit vote, but then SDD was sick and said the time was extended indefinitely and so a ton of discussion started.



columbia wrote:Learned a serious lesson in this game...
Don't start any sentences with "I".



TheHammer24 wrote:MWB wrote:Sam's Drunk Dog wrote:Looking back I would have only allowed the green vig to kill every other night once the vendetta began. I also would have not allowed the green recruit to take Wyatt's place after the vig died. I also should have made Wyatt safe every 3 nights instead of every other night.
I didn't expect the reds to target MWB the first night. If they had targeted someone else night one, Kraftster probably wouldn't know that MWB was Wyatt since at that point the greens weren't allowed to talk.
I will say, if I didn't have the night one protect it probably would have been a quick win for the reds though. Kraftster and I would have been out in the first two nights and relantel would have been on his own the rest of the way.
I'm not sure I would have gone after Kraftster, if you didn't get the protect, though. As Caanan was pointing out, Kraftster's ostensible knowledge of you not being protected by an angel was a little tip off. I may still gone after him though, because he's come in late and barely participated last two games, and this game he was active at the start, so I assumed he got a PM.
NAN suggested you were the angel, and as such, we couldn't risk going after you twice in a row, but ideally we should have killed you again on night 2. That way you would have lost your recruit and your vig powers, and the game would have been a lot more symmetrical.


Willie Kool wrote:Great game SDD and players. It was fun to watch.
SDD - the hint given in the Day 1 and Night 2 write-ups seemed intentional? I couldn't believe no one picked up on it.Spoiler:


mac5155 wrote:Not once did we attempt to kill a blue. Every kill we had was on a green


Users browsing this forum: Crankshaft and 1 guest