Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
pittsoccer33 wrote:there isnt much else to say. its like picking a ferarri or a lamborghini. you win with either.
pittsoccer33 wrote:3D "should" theoretically be better on a plasma tv than an LCD due to the refresh speeds. LCD makers were throwing blank frames into each eye after every real frame to help with motion. Plasma didn't need to do that to reduce blurring.
pittsoccer33 wrote:well that is a really good price. you looked at them yourself and thought the sony was superior. if you're thinking about a new tv you cant really do much better in terms of price on a tv that good.
eddysnake wrote:
Are you certified to do calibrations?
pittsoccer33 wrote:eddysnake wrote:
Are you certified to do calibrations?
i am not. wish i was though. probably don't have the patience for it.
for my panasonic I used avsforum poster D-Nice's calibration offsets. not perfect but far superior to my friend who has the same tv (he comments every time he comes over) navigating the panasonic service menu is a nightmare. its clear they dont want average joes in there.
viva la ben wrote:Nevermind Vizio, now I'm interested in a LG 55LW5700. I just read too many problems with VIZIO. Costco has the lg for 1299+99 for a 5 year square trade ESP. I don't want to regret not going bigger
JeffDFD wrote:viva la ben wrote:Nevermind Vizio, now I'm interested in a LG 55LW5700. I just read too many problems with VIZIO. Costco has the lg for 1299+99 for a 5 year square trade ESP. I don't want to regret not going bigger
My goal was to get a TV bigger screen wise than my wife. Success! Good thing my wife is shorter.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests