canaan wrote: columbia wrote:
MWB wrote:This game has pretty much proven the way to win is not participate.
if you guys voted off those who arent participating, you would have been much better off.
I think two of the biggest turning points were:
1) Keeping the angel hidden after the seer died, and it was obvious the angel was attacked on Night 2. That just kept info from the village that the baddies knew. I think people have played this game enough where slipping up and naming MWB the angel by an accident was very, very minimal IMO. And the chances were greater that a villager blindly would target him. That happened, implicated me as bad, and that was another wasted day that could have been avoided IMO.
2) I think the day Juice was busy and couldn't participate, I think he would have jumped on the quiet bandwagon as well and maybe convinced some people. Instead, people followed Pavel. When there are that many people not participating, I think it's easy for a wolf or two to hide in that pack as they can't slip up, and if some heat gets on them, they will do what everyone else does and start to participate, which could get them to slip up.
Also, one thing I never understand. At the beginning of the game, typically one or two people will take charge and start the voting because most people are scared to. I would start off a vote, people would jump on board, and it turned out a villager would be dead. On like day 3, people use that as evidence I'm bad. My question is, the chances of voting a villager of are FAR greater at the beginning of the game, especially when there is little info. I have no idea how that implicates you as bad. Personally, I think the bad people sit back at the beginning as to not stir the pot.
Horrible game by the village, myself included.