It comes down to believing TH24.
shafnutz05 wrote: If hammer is telling the truth, then we had to have bad one pair of masons that were legit, and one pair that had one from each side, like we've had in games before. Klinger told me that he really hoped I wasnt red in one of our most recent communications. Was that a ploy to deflect my suspicions away from him?
Going back to relantel...do we STILL think he's telling the truth? We are now up to five green RPs...FWIW, Klinger was initially hesitant to to after rel, telling me that he was convinced rel was the vig. With rel coming out 20 minutes after the write up and saying its time to go after hammer...hmm.
relantel wrote:I can razzy klinger. Worst case if we are wrong is the game is over, and we get out of the mess of a game.
TheHammer24 wrote:Why was it a poor move? My logic was that I was the only green with powers. Therefore, the see would likely be worthless. I spelled it out; I figured it was best to pretend like I saw. Not being defensive out of anything but pride here.
Also, Krafster - to lend credence to me telling the truth, THG showed as the Krugan, who is the bad character in the Highlander. It would be strange to create a good-bad character battle and not have the one go good and the other go bad after the battle. Just another little piece of evidence.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests