Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf

Kraftster wrote:Well, the successful klinger kill would seem to come about as close as you can get to confirming Hammer, I'd say, right?







TheHammer24 wrote:My concern is that we still don't know how NAN died. I'm fine with this being Rel, but it means there are only two Reds.

TheHammer24 wrote:Oh. I'm an idiot - juice did those. I don't know what to make of the missed shots and rel's role claim though. Strange strategy. But it seems it just has to be Rel. If we are wrong, I have my role block which would give us a 50% chance of getting it.



TheHammer24 wrote:I Role Blocked Rel, and Slappy died. (This happened after the fact, as Pavel forgot). I don't don't know what to think about this.


shafnutz05 wrote:Edit: I meant or did your role block of relantel not matter either way?




shafnutz05 wrote:Funny....because Hammer's failed role block makes me think this points directly at Kraftster. My eagerness is hardly a damning trait...I went off on relantel before I was made aware of Hammer's failed role block.
Again, why in the world would where be two red masons (a)? Again, why in the WORLD would I just go out on a monstrous limb?
After Gaucho outed me as blue, I made a post letting everyone know my role, as well as the fact that Klinger was my partner. That would make absolutely zero sense for me to draw that much attention to both myself and my fellow red when there was no heat on us!!!
I'm honestly not sure where to go at this point. I was 100% convinced that relantel was it today, but now thehammer is saying his role claim had no effect.






shafnutz05 wrote:I completely understand how bizarre this info is.
I am keeping my vote on relantel. I have been on him the entire game, and I'm not going to let off now. I don't think the role block not working clears him in any way.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests