Rylan wrote:If the Rangers also lose then no harm no foul.
Wouldn't it be better if they were chasing us?
Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
Rylan wrote:If the Rangers also lose then no harm no foul.


offsides wrote:Rylan wrote:If the Rangers also lose then no harm no foul.
Wouldn't it be better if they were chasing us?

bigkam wrote:Grunthy wrote:DelPen wrote:hockeymon wrote:bigkam wrote:Paul Martin with another gem of a defensive play that almost ended up in our net. What a waste of a sweater he can be.
Martin is a huge waste of $5 million. Not sure how anyone can argue he's been worth his contract this year.
Except that he has played really good since like december.
Right, but he's had some horrendous games (see: tonight) as well. Which was my point, end of story.

Grunthy wrote:malksby8771 wrote:KG wrote:Rylan wrote:If the Rangers also lose then no harm no foul.
that is true....
no its not....
considering we would still control our own destiny, it kind of is...




malksby8771 wrote:Grunthy wrote:malksby8771 wrote:KG wrote:Rylan wrote:If the Rangers also lose then no harm no foul.
that is true....
no its not....
considering we would still control our own destiny, it kind of is...
theres plenty of harm if fleury is hurt, which we dont know yet. plus, we cant afford to be losing our easy games if we expect to gain on the rags, controlling destiny or not, given how much easier their schedule is than ours....






shafnutz05 wrote:I love NHL officiating


Gaucho wrote:Flower said he is allright, so there is every reason to panic.



mac5155 wrote:Can I blame the refs yet or will that make me a Homer




Rylan wrote:Pens also have Letang and Niskanen out. How easy we forget...

Grunthy wrote:mac5155 wrote:Can I blame the refs yet or will that make me a Homer

bigkam wrote:How many odd-man rushes have we given up in this one? 20 or so seem fair?

Users browsing this forum: Gage18, GDR, jimreb, offsides, ScottishPenguin, SubtropicalPenguin, Tybrus and 62 guests