Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
MRandall25 wrote:Out of the 3, Hitchcock. Any of the other 2 would be a joke.
SolidSnake wrote:I think MacLean should win it, but that's just me. Esp for a first time ever head coach in the NHL
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=394652
SolidSnake wrote:MRandall25 wrote:Out of the 3, Hitchcock. Any of the other 2 would be a joke.
Yea, MacLean taking a team that was predicted to be 15th in the conf, in his first head coaching gig, winning it would be a joke?
Hitchcock made his debut behind the St. Louis bench Nov. 8 with the club at 6-7-0 and posted a 43-15-11 record the rest of the way
MRandall25 wrote:SolidSnake wrote:MRandall25 wrote:Out of the 3, Hitchcock. Any of the other 2 would be a joke.
Yea, MacLean taking a team that was predicted to be 15th in the conf, in his first head coaching gig, winning it would be a joke?
Key word is predicted.Hitchcock made his debut behind the St. Louis bench Nov. 8 with the club at 6-7-0 and posted a 43-15-11 record the rest of the way
I'd like to call that "results"
SolidSnake wrote:MRandall25 wrote:SolidSnake wrote:MRandall25 wrote:Out of the 3, Hitchcock. Any of the other 2 would be a joke.
Yea, MacLean taking a team that was predicted to be 15th in the conf, in his first head coaching gig, winning it would be a joke?
Key word is predicted.Hitchcock made his debut behind the St. Louis bench Nov. 8 with the club at 6-7-0 and posted a 43-15-11 record the rest of the way
I'd like to call that "results"
The Blues were 6-7 when Hitchcock, arrived, they weren't that bad of shape. MacLean Did MORE with LESS.
Pavel Bure wrote:Think about it, after Hitch took over the Blue only lost 8 games in regulation the entire rest of the season. That's it. That's just a baffling turn around for a team that was floundering at .500 and considered to not have a solid goalie.
SolidSnake wrote:Pavel Bure wrote:Think about it, after Hitch took over the Blue only lost 8 games in regulation the entire rest of the season. That's it. That's just a baffling turn around for a team that was floundering at .500 and considered to not have a solid goalie.
They have Halak lol
Pavel Bure wrote:SolidSnake wrote:Pavel Bure wrote:Think about it, after Hitch took over the Blue only lost 8 games in regulation the entire rest of the season. That's it. That's just a baffling turn around for a team that was floundering at .500 and considered to not have a solid goalie.
They have Halak lol
Exactly haha.
SolidSnake wrote:Pavel Bure wrote:SolidSnake wrote:Pavel Bure wrote:Think about it, after Hitch took over the Blue only lost 8 games in regulation the entire rest of the season. That's it. That's just a baffling turn around for a team that was floundering at .500 and considered to not have a solid goalie.
They have Halak lol
Exactly haha.
uh no, they got Halak. He's perfect for Hitchcock style hockey. I will say the same thing, we will agree to disagree.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests