Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
steelhammer wrote:The fact that it is only a 1-game suspension only confirms the conspiratorial nature of the NHL and Comcast. They can use the file footage for the definition of head shots they are supposedly trying to remove from the game.
steelhammer wrote:The fact that it is only a 1-game suspension only confirms the conspiratorial nature of the NHL and Comcast. They can use the file footage for the definition of head shots they are supposedly trying to remove from the game.
Malkamaniac wrote:Giroux was a first time suspension. I consider what he did prior to the hit the reason it happened. Dude went nuts because his team didn't get a call and solely went out to hurt a player. Had he not argued before that, and we're looking at a completely different situation. He literally went out of his way to hurt a player right after he melted down.
The one game is fair.
Malkamaniac wrote:Giroux was a first time suspension. I consider what he did prior to the hit the reason it happened. Dude went nuts because his team didn't get a call and solely went out to hurt a player. Had he not argued before that, and we're looking at a completely different situation. He literally went out of his way to hurt a player right after he melted down.
The one game is fair.
4m Dejan Kovacevic Dejan Kovacevic @Dejan_Kovacevic
Hockey fans, when you have absolutely zero defense for a cheap hit, try this: WHAT ABOUT BLANKETY-BLANK'S HIT, HUH? THAT WAS MUCH WORSE!
columbia wrote:Malkamaniac wrote:Giroux was a first time suspension. I consider what he did prior to the hit the reason it happened. Dude went nuts because his team didn't get a call and solely went out to hurt a player. Had he not argued before that, and we're looking at a completely different situation. He literally went out of his way to hurt a player right after he melted down.
The one game is fair.
One game is not fair, in an instance like that, IMO.
5 sounds better to me.
Malkamaniac wrote:columbia wrote:Malkamaniac wrote:Giroux was a first time suspension. I consider what he did prior to the hit the reason it happened. Dude went nuts because his team didn't get a call and solely went out to hurt a player. Had he not argued before that, and we're looking at a completely different situation. He literally went out of his way to hurt a player right after he melted down.
The one game is fair.
One game is not fair, in an instance like that, IMO.
5 sounds better to me.
I'm fine with the one game suspension considering it was his first disciplinary action. That being said, had he not acted like a little child, it wouldn't have been this severe.
shmenguin wrote:i guess if i were a flyers fan or player, i would be bent out of shape that malkin has gone this long without even getting a fine from the league. dude has done a ton of bad things. but right now, i wouldn't have that at the top of my list of gripes like they all do. i'd be waaaaay more upset with the defacto captain blowing up for some reason in a 3-2 freakin' hockey game.
shmenguin wrote:i've looked around a bit in puck daddy comments and twitter conversations. i haven't seen 1 flyers fan show any dissatisfaction with giroux. that is f'ing unbelievable. it's a 2-1 series and you're down 1 goal. and a trapezoid violation is going to send you off the deep end ?!? and this is coming on the heels of the officials trying to do everything they could to hand your team a game 3 win!?! like, seriously. what the hell, dude?
shafnutz05 wrote:lol, Roenick just said he was "depressed" that the Flyers were playing so poorly this series, on the Fanatic radio station down here. RUT ROH
shmenguin wrote:i guess if i were a flyers fan or player, i would be bent out of shape that malkin has gone this long without even getting a fine from the league. dude has done a ton of bad things. but right now, i wouldn't have that at the top of my list of gripes like they all do. i'd be waaaaay more upset with the defacto captain blowing up for some reason in a 3-2 freakin' hockey game.
shmenguin wrote:i guess if i were a flyers fan or player, i would be bent out of shape that malkin has gone this long without even getting a fine from the league. dude has done a ton of bad things. but right now, i wouldn't have that at the top of my list of gripes like they all do. i'd be waaaaay more upset with the defacto captain blowing up for some reason in a 3-2 freakin' hockey game.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest