pressure=9Pa wrote:Pens15 wrote:
But above all, it seems that it needs to be stated, yet again, if Staal is traded, the main purpose will be to avoid losing him for nothing. NOT for cap reasons, and NOT for hockey reasons. It could be pretty difficult to swing a Staal trade that makes the team better immediately, before any additional moves are made.
How dare you inject logic into our thread!
True very true, losing and asset like Staal for nothing would do nothng more than open up cap space. I said it befor, and as bad as it sounds. You are better off signing Staal then tryng to trade him. You are promised maximum value for him that way. But that would be kinda cold signing him then moving him. Or at the least give the other team a chance to sign him to a long term deal befor the trade goes through.