Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf

skullman80 wrote: how they can have half the jury have ties to PSU, one I think being a current student, and a couple being former professors?


Sam's Drunk Dog wrote:If the trial is being held in Centre County than it is impossible to not have jurors with ties to Penn State. I believe only the defense can make a motion to move the trial to another location.




shafnutz05 wrote:Yeah, I think people are completely misinterpreting the makeup of the jury here. If anything, the defense would be more likely to request a change of venue. You think people that have close ties to the university are going to be less inclined to find Sandusky guilty? No way. Jerry Sandusky did more to crush and damage Penn State University than anyone else in history, and it is not even close by a long shot.
Penn Staters are still furious with that man, and rightfully so. The prosecution would be silly to request a different venue, if they could even do that.


columbia wrote:Assuming that the evidence is there for a conviction, I have a hard time believing that someone is so drinking the PSU kool-aid, that he would be acquitted.
Stranger things have happened, I suppose.




shmenguin wrote:if there is bias from a local jury, i don't see why it would be "pro-sandusky". the PSU faithful must view him as the cause of jopa's downfall, right?


In the end .. this trial really won't have a good ending, because either Sandusky is proven of being a child molester, or a bunch of kids made up a bunch of lies and ruined a guys image.




skullman80 wrote:So the Sandusky trial starts today... does anyone think we can have a civil discussion about this and not get it locked? I ask that seriously....
I posed a question in JTOR that I later deleted because I didn't want that thread to have a shot of being deleted. I'm honestly curious though, even though I know State College is a small community, how they can have half the jury have ties to PSU, one I think being a current student, and a couple being former professors?
In the end .. this trial really won't have a good ending, because either Sandusky is proven of being a child molester, or a bunch of kids made up a bunch of lies and ruined a guys image.

no name wrote:In the end .. this trial really won't have a good ending, because either Sandusky is proven of being a child molester, or a bunch of kids made up a bunch of lies and ruined a guys image.
See i kinda worry about these kind of cases in another way..
1. the defence gets him off scott free when he is guilty
2. or he is innocent and found guilty.
In the end i just pray justice is servered. But i think our system gets it right more so than not.


SirMario66 wrote:Apparently, it's usually available to the public after it passes through the court. Must be something pretty damning.

IanMoran wrote:SirMario66 wrote:Apparently, it's usually available to the public after it passes through the court. Must be something pretty damning.
Idk, that's assuming a lot tbh..

Hockeynut! wrote:IanMoran wrote:SirMario66 wrote:Apparently, it's usually available to the public after it passes through the court. Must be something pretty damning.
Idk, that's assuming a lot tbh..
Yeah, lots of "celebrity" wills are sealed.


Users browsing this forum: ajh2298, DudeMan2766, She'sTheFastest and 22 guests