Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf






lemieuxReturns wrote:If the argument against PA Parenteau is that he only produces because he plays with superstars, then i would counter argue who cares? We have a ton of superstars.

lemieuxReturns wrote:If the argument against PA Parenteau is that he only produces because he plays with superstars, then i would counter argue who cares? We have a ton of superstars.

Streaks House wrote:lemieuxReturns wrote:If the argument against PA Parenteau is that he only produces because he plays with superstars, then i would counter argue who cares? We have a ton of superstars.
I don't buy that logic. Just as Malkin and Crosby play a different style of game, so too does Tavares compared to Crosby...Crosby needs wingers with speed, not an anchor like PAP. Just don't see PAP's game being compatible with Crosby's playing style.

lemieuxReturns wrote:Streaks House wrote:lemieuxReturns wrote:If the argument against PA Parenteau is that he only produces because he plays with superstars, then i would counter argue who cares? We have a ton of superstars.
I don't buy that logic. Just as Malkin and Crosby play a different style of game, so too does Tavares compared to Crosby...Crosby needs wingers with speed, not an anchor like PAP. Just don't see PAP's game being compatible with Crosby's playing style.
??? Crosby and Tavares actually have very very similar playing styles. Have you ever watched Tavares, or are you just making stuff up?

Streaks House wrote:lemieuxReturns wrote:Streaks House wrote:lemieuxReturns wrote:If the argument against PA Parenteau is that he only produces because he plays with superstars, then i would counter argue who cares? We have a ton of superstars.
I don't buy that logic. Just as Malkin and Crosby play a different style of game, so too does Tavares compared to Crosby...Crosby needs wingers with speed, not an anchor like PAP. Just don't see PAP's game being compatible with Crosby's playing style.
??? Crosby and Tavares actually have very very similar playing styles. Have you ever watched Tavares, or are you just making stuff up?
When Crosby was playing his best hockey, who were his wingers? Kunitz and Dupuis. They have the speed required to play with Crosby. PAP is too slow, and if that's not apparent, I question if you are making things up.

lemieuxReturns wrote:
Parise should be our main goal.


lemieuxReturns wrote:Streaks House wrote:lemieuxReturns wrote:Streaks House wrote:lemieuxReturns wrote:If the argument against PA Parenteau is that he only produces because he plays with superstars, then i would counter argue who cares? We have a ton of superstars.
I don't buy that logic. Just as Malkin and Crosby play a different style of game, so too does Tavares compared to Crosby...Crosby needs wingers with speed, not an anchor like PAP. Just don't see PAP's game being compatible with Crosby's playing style.
??? Crosby and Tavares actually have very very similar playing styles. Have you ever watched Tavares, or are you just making stuff up?
When Crosby was playing his best hockey, who were his wingers? Kunitz and Dupuis. They have the speed required to play with Crosby. PAP is too slow, and if that's not apparent, I question if you are making things up.
Not real sure where you are going with this. My point is PA Parenteau produced with a guy named Tavares. If the argument is that PA only produced because he played with a superstar in Tavares, then i would say we also have superstars.
You made the point that Sid and Malkin do not play the same way as Tavares. I then argued that Sid and Tavares actually have a very similar playing style.
You are now saying PA is slow. I said nothing about PA's speed.

Gaucho wrote:lemieuxReturns wrote:
Parise should be our main goal.
Shouldn't our main goal be to strengthen the D, especially if we trade Martin, as you propose?

PAP's lack of speed is part of the reason he would not be a good fit with Crosby. On what basis is PAP an upgrade over Kunitz and Dupuis?



lemieuxReturns wrote:I actually like PA. But not near enough to say we should not get parise and get him instead.
Hopefully the pens do the following IN ORDER:
1. trade Martin before July 1st
2. sign (attempt to sign) parise on July 1st
3. sign (attempt to sign) suter on July 1st
4. announce Sid's new contract.
5. sign PA Parenteau, Niski, Samuelsson (florida)
You would then have:
Letang / Suter
Niski / Orpik
Despres / Engel
Lovejoy, strait, burt
Dupuis / Sid / Parise
Neal / Malkin / Kunitz
Parenteau / Sutter / Samuelsson
Cooke / Adams / Kennedy
Jefferey
MY MAIN FEAR:
Would be that Shero somehow gets too involved in Suter on July 1st, and we somehow miss out on Parise. Suter is a crap shoot. We could be the highest bidder and still only have a 10% chance he signs with us... especially in light of all the rumors we are hearing about him only wanting to sign out west. Shero has made the mistake before where he thinks he has an inside track on a former predator only to find out he really had nothing at all. Hamhuis.
Parise should be our main goal.
Lastly, if Shero did as was suggested above and got PA Parenteau instead of Parise, i would not be surprised if the so called discount Sid was open to giving the penguins suddently dissapeared.


Users browsing this forum: ajh2298 and 7 guests