Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf





Rylan wrote:BUT THE PENS SUCK AT DRAFTING!!!!



RisslingsMissingTeeth wrote:Hard to see all of those solid wingers land on other teams
RisslingsMissingTeeth wrote:It is so hard to judge NHL drafts until like 3-5 years after


sil wrote:RisslingsMissingTeeth wrote:Hard to see all of those solid wingers land on other teamsRisslingsMissingTeeth wrote:It is so hard to judge NHL drafts until like 3-5 years after
Not to argue with you, because I can understand where you're coming from, but don't these statements conflict with each other...just a tad?

RisslingsMissingTeeth wrote:sil wrote:RisslingsMissingTeeth wrote:Hard to see all of those solid wingers land on other teamsRisslingsMissingTeeth wrote:It is so hard to judge NHL drafts until like 3-5 years after
Not to argue with you, because I can understand where you're coming from, but don't these statements conflict with each other...just a tad?
I guess if you add the word "prospect" you will see where I was coming from. We all know that NHL teams draft prospects, I just assumed that was understood, especially when you read the end of the sentence you cut off, specifically "in the hopper".

RisslingsMissingTeeth wrote:sil wrote:RisslingsMissingTeeth wrote:Hard to see all of those solid wingers land on other teamsRisslingsMissingTeeth wrote:It is so hard to judge NHL drafts until like 3-5 years after
Not to argue with you, because I can understand where you're coming from, but don't these statements conflict with each other...just a tad?
I guess if you add the word "prospect" you will see where I was coming from. We all know that NHL teams draft prospects, I just assumed that was understood, especially when you read the end of the sentence you cut off, specifically "in the hopper".

sil wrote:RisslingsMissingTeeth wrote:sil wrote:RisslingsMissingTeeth wrote:Hard to see all of those solid wingers land on other teamsRisslingsMissingTeeth wrote:It is so hard to judge NHL drafts until like 3-5 years after
Not to argue with you, because I can understand where you're coming from, but don't these statements conflict with each other...just a tad?
I guess if you add the word "prospect" you will see where I was coming from. We all know that NHL teams draft prospects, I just assumed that was understood, especially when you read the end of the sentence you cut off, specifically "in the hopper".
The word "prospect" after "solid winger" does add clarity, though I was being intentionally obtuse with my post. It's possible Pouliot could prove to be a far better player than any winger drafted around him, or, at the very least, Shero and his staff feel that's possible, hence why they passed on those "solid (prospects.)" The primary point of my post is that we really won't know how "solid" Forsberg, Grigorenko, etc are until 3-5 years from now...same with Derek Pouliot.

steelhammer wrote:Would have been nice to see the Pens go the route of the Flames and trade down their 8th pick to pick up another 2nd round pick. They still could have gotten Pouliot in the mid 1st round. Overall though I really like what the Pens walked away with. The 2nd goalie pick was not a good value pick at all though.

Idoit40fans wrote:Rylan wrote:BUT THE PENS SUCK AT DRAFTING!!!!
The normal defense of that completely sound argument is that it takes 3-5 years to judge a draft. It goes both ways.
Upon reading this article, its pretty worthless. No thought into it, literally comparing the draft to this guy's draft board pick for pick. Unless you're interested in that kind of thing, don't bother reading it.

Users browsing this forum: Pavement and 6 guests