Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf



Indyman wrote:I'm not sure if this has been discussed yet, but...
David Poile was quoted yesterday saying:
“Going into training camp, we are not done adding pieces if we can add another piece, especially in a top four defense we are going to try and do that,” Trotz said later Wednesday on a conference call discussing the matching of Weber’s offer sheet. “There is limited value out there in terms of free agency, but there are guys we are looking at a possibility of a trade. There could be a piece there.”
We all know the ties between Shero and Poile...
My questions are:
1. If we send Martin to Nashville, what kind of return could we be looking at?
2. Who's realistically going to play D this year? I'm not sure the young guys are quite ready yet...


shmenguin wrote:i don't really like martin, and i do think it's possible that depres will give you a better net performance than him.
but we can't trade him away without an established top 4 guy coming back. it's just too risky.

columbia wrote:Letang, Orpik, and Niskanen + TBD would make me pretty uneasy.
There are no guarantees that Niskanen can handle the big minutes over a full season.


sil wrote:shmenguin wrote:i don't really like martin, and i do think it's possible that depres will give you a better net performance than him.
but we can't trade him away without an established top 4 guy coming back. it's just too risky.
If Poile were to give Klein back in the trade (their #4 D for our #2D...based on minutes in 2011-12)...I'd probably go for the deal. KK has one year left @ 1.3M I believe.

shmenguin wrote:sil wrote:shmenguin wrote:i don't really like martin, and i do think it's possible that depres will give you a better net performance than him.
but we can't trade him away without an established top 4 guy coming back. it's just too risky.
If Poile were to give Klein back in the trade (their #4 D for our #2D...based on minutes in 2011-12)...I'd probably go for the deal. KK has one year left @ 1.3M I believe.
looks like klein got good minutes in nashville. a minute less at ES than martin and roughly the same short handed minutes on a defensively sound team. conceptually, this is a player that i would probably accept in a martin trade. but i know diddly squat about this guy, and if he's cheap and effective, nashville will want to keep him i'm sure.


meecrofilm wrote:Yeah, kinda need to hold on to Martin at this point, at least for the time being.



Mr. Colby wrote:Our D wouldn't be questionable at all if Letang, Orpik, and Martin played to their capabilities
Disclaimer: To avoid starting a war over taking a shot at the beloved Letang, I will specify that I am referring to his defensive zone play only.


Froggy wrote:If Nashville needs a top 4 d man, why would they trade us one of their top 4 d men?


Rylan wrote:I feel Dax Shepherd could easily play top 4 minutes.




mikey287 wrote:We're going to need some NHL caliber d-men to start the year probably...

sil wrote:columbia wrote:Letang, Orpik, and Niskanen + TBD would make me pretty uneasy.
There are no guarantees that Niskanen can handle the big minutes over a full season.
You're right, there aren't, but I was looking at the numbers yesterday, and what was interesting was a comparison of Niskanen to Michalek. Niskanen was just about 00:53 less TOI/game than Michalek, but Michalek played significantly more minutes/game on PK than Niskanen did...which indicates that Z was really beginning to lose out on 5-on-5 minutes in favor of Niskanen.

JoseCuervo wrote:mikey287 wrote:We're going to need some NHL caliber d-men to start the year probably...
pfft...
despres-morrow
strait-harrington
bortuzzo-dumoulin
Letang
championship

Users browsing this forum: America, Great58, pressure=9Pa, tfrizz, topshelf66 and 37 guests