Forum for Pittsburgh Penguins-related messages.
Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
by llipgh2 on Wed Aug 01, 2012 12:14 pm
-
llipgh2
- AHL Hall of Famer

-
- Posts: 8,380
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 3:29 pm
- Location: Back off, you maple syrup sucking puck slappers!
by shmenguin on Wed Aug 01, 2012 12:19 pm
was SMG in charge of the crappy ice surface?
-
shmenguin
- NHL Fourth Liner

-
- Posts: 17,620
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 11:34 pm
by jimjom on Wed Aug 01, 2012 12:25 pm
Keeping Armark as concession manager.
Guess that means we are stuck with RC Cola.
-
jimjom
- AHL All-Star

-
- Posts: 6,476
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:34 pm
- Location: Presto
-
by Spangler on Wed Aug 01, 2012 12:50 pm
Aramark runs Heinz field which doesn't have RC Cola. Blame the Pens for that.
-
Spangler
- ECHL'er

-
- Posts: 821
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:31 am
- Location: Outer Heaven
by Idoit40fans on Wed Aug 01, 2012 12:53 pm
What did SMG do to Crosby?
-
Idoit40fans
- NHL Third Liner

-
- Posts: 40,733
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 2:42 pm
- Location: Punchable faces.
-
by KennyTheKangaroo on Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:55 pm
so this means there wont be long ass lines at the bathroom anymore, right?
-
KennyTheKangaroo
- AHL Hall of Famer

-
- Posts: 9,781
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 12:15 am
- Location: Under the Skycoaster
by AlexPKeaton on Wed Aug 01, 2012 4:07 pm
jimjom wrote:Keeping Armark as concession manager.
Guess that means we are stuck with RC Cola.
And crappy nacho "cheese".

-
AlexPKeaton
- NHL Healthy Scratch

-
- Posts: 12,192
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:46 am
- Location: Malkinite Compound
by pugilist13 on Wed Aug 01, 2012 4:42 pm
Idoit40fans wrote:What did SMG do to Crosby?
Were gonna take away his private entrance

-
pugilist13
- ECHL'er

-
- Posts: 1,130
- Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:51 pm
- Location: your back yard
by relantel on Fri Aug 03, 2012 5:19 pm
I'm surprised SMG made it to Consol at all, given the whole Mellon mismanagement.
-
relantel
- NHL Healthy Scratch

-
- Posts: 14,380
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:24 am
- Location: PM me your email addy for invite to LGP Extra Attacker league
-
by DelPen on Sat Aug 04, 2012 8:22 am
Who was in charge of the security that ignored all the assaults?
-
DelPen
- NHL Third Liner

-
- Posts: 28,655
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 9:27 am
- Location: Lake Wylie, SC
by KBone on Sun Aug 05, 2012 1:39 pm
If only there was a way to fire RC Cola!
-
KBone
- Junior 'A'

-
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 9:02 pm
- Location: Not Pittsburgh : (
by CERV96 on Sun Aug 05, 2012 3:34 pm
DelPen wrote:Who was in charge of the security that ignored all the assaults?
Yes. SMG is in charge of security, maintenence(although they can not be replaced due to union shop), and bringing in shows and events other than hockey. SMG is not in charge of concessions.
What is all of the RC cola hate? Then again I only drink booze at games so I guess this does not effect me.
-
CERV96
- AHL All-Star

-
- Posts: 5,720
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 12:49 am
- Location: Donating my jaw to Crosby
by pens#1 on Sun Aug 05, 2012 7:12 pm
SMG- i could be wrong but wasnt that company owned or ran or had something to do with Ed Snider SMG=Snyder Management Group?
-
pens#1
- NHL Healthy Scratch

-
- Posts: 13,843
- Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 9:05 pm
- Location: allentown
by brwi on Sun Aug 05, 2012 7:33 pm
pens#1 wrote:SMG- i could be wrong but wasnt that company owned or ran or had something to do with Ed Snider SMG=Snyder Management Group?
Yep. They also gave Howard Baldwin some upfront cash in return for a new deal with the Pens/ SMG that was very brutal to the Penguins back then. Loan sharks were very jealous of SMG! Once the Pens went into bankruptcy, that old deal got tossed and new one created.
-
brwi
- NHL Healthy Scratch

-
- Posts: 10,514
- Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 1:36 am
by BurghersAndDogsSports on Sun Aug 05, 2012 8:24 pm
I remember that all the union contracts, even the grumpy b@stards that give you your tickets at the window, signed deals for years.
I imagine its a simple decision of AEG will do it cheaper or get more concerts or something. Cause not sure they can change much else
even if the wanted to.
-
BurghersAndDogsSports
- ECHL'er

-
- Posts: 1,363
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 10:42 am
- Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
by Lt. Dish on Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:03 am
brwi wrote:pens#1 wrote:SMG- i could be wrong but wasnt that company owned or ran or had something to do with Ed Snider SMG=Snyder Management Group?
Yep. They also gave Howard Baldwin some upfront cash in return for a new deal with the Pens/ SMG that was very brutal to the Penguins back then. Loan sharks were very jealous of SMG! Once the Pens went into bankruptcy, that old deal got tossed and new one created.
That's right, brwi, and the brutal deal entailed (in part) no $$$ from the gate, concessions, or parking, right?
Ed Snider sold Spectacor's share well over a decade ago, but I thought of him immediately when I saw this piece of news. What an awful way to start the day. (Breakfast was the turning point

to set things right, and putting on my 2009 SC Champs t-shirt completed the exorcism.)
-
Lt. Dish
- AHL'er

-
- Posts: 4,257
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:07 pm
- Location: Living Comfort Eagle
by BurghersAndDogsSports on Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:15 am
Lt. Dish wrote:brwi wrote:pens#1 wrote:SMG- i could be wrong but wasnt that company owned or ran or had something to do with Ed Snider SMG=Snyder Management Group?
Yep. They also gave Howard Baldwin some upfront cash in return for a new deal with the Pens/ SMG that was very brutal to the Penguins back then. Loan sharks were very jealous of SMG! Once the Pens went into bankruptcy, that old deal got tossed and new one created.
That's right, brwi, and the brutal deal entailed (in part) no $$$ from the gate, concessions, or parking, right?
Ed Snider sold Spectacor's share well over a decade ago, but I thought of him immediately when I saw this piece of news. What an awful way to start the day. (Breakfast was the turning point

to set things right, and putting on my 2009 SC Champs t-shirt completed the exorcism.)
I dont remember specifics but they are different from food and ticket money. I think the deal was more for the money from concerts. Correct me if I am wrong but didnt we sell off our assets in a bad food deal too. It wasnt just SMG that did the loan sharking I think Aramark too.
Its not like they were bad companies the Pens needed money to keep the team together. The deals were not "horribly one sided", the Pens did get a ton of money up front. The issue was that in the next years the Penguins then had zero money coming in from them. I should clarify that of course SMG and Aramark still got the better of the deals but its not as bad as it sounded. It just took away their ability to make money in the long run.
-
BurghersAndDogsSports
- ECHL'er

-
- Posts: 1,363
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 10:42 am
- Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
by Lt. Dish on Mon Aug 06, 2012 10:34 am
BurghersAndDogsSports wrote:Lt. Dish wrote:brwi wrote:pens#1 wrote:SMG- i could be wrong but wasnt that company owned or ran or had something to do with Ed Snider SMG=Snyder Management Group?
Yep. They also gave Howard Baldwin some upfront cash in return for a new deal with the Pens/ SMG that was very brutal to the Penguins back then. Loan sharks were very jealous of SMG! Once the Pens went into bankruptcy, that old deal got tossed and new one created.
That's right, brwi, and the brutal deal entailed (in part) no $$$ from the gate, concessions, or parking, right?
Ed Snider sold Spectacor's share well over a decade ago, but I thought of him immediately when I saw this piece of news. What an awful way to start the day. (Breakfast was the turning point

to set things right, and putting on my 2009 SC Champs t-shirt completed the exorcism.)
I dont remember specifics but they are different from food and ticket money. I think the deal was more for the money from concerts. Correct me if I am wrong but didnt we sell off our assets in a bad food deal too. It wasnt just SMG that did the loan sharking I think Aramark too.
Its not like they were bad companies the Pens needed money to keep the team together. The deals were not "horribly one sided", the Pens did get a ton of money up front. The issue was that in the next years the Penguins then had zero money coming in from them. I should clarify that of course SMG and Aramark still got the better of the deals but its not as bad as it sounded. It just took away their ability to make money in the long run.
Thanks, BaDS! Your memory is waaay better than mine, for sure. My, how far the franchise come since those days--to the brink and back...

-
Lt. Dish
- AHL'er

-
- Posts: 4,257
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:07 pm
- Location: Living Comfort Eagle
by brwi on Mon Aug 06, 2012 11:00 am
BurghersAndDogsSports wrote:I dont remember specifics but they are different from food and ticket money. I think the deal was more for the money from concerts. Correct me if I am wrong but didnt we sell off our assets in a bad food deal too. It wasnt just SMG that did the loan sharking I think Aramark too.
Its not like they were bad companies the Pens needed money to keep the team together. The deals were not "horribly one sided", the Pens did get a ton of money up front. The issue was that in the next years the Penguins then had zero money coming in from them. I should clarify that of course SMG and Aramark still got the better of the deals but its not as bad as it sounded. It just took away their ability to make money in the long run.
I don't remember any Baldwin deals with Aramark. SMG was getting all revenues from parking and concessions and I believe SMG was contracting out the concessions to Aramark themselves, not the Penguins. The other long-term killer deal he swung was to Fox Sports Pittsburgh, giving away all arena advertising revenues and marketing rights to them for some upfront cash.
-
brwi
- NHL Healthy Scratch

-
- Posts: 10,514
- Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 1:36 am
by BurghersAndDogsSports on Mon Aug 06, 2012 1:46 pm
brwi wrote:BurghersAndDogsSports wrote:I dont remember specifics but they are different from food and ticket money. I think the deal was more for the money from concerts. Correct me if I am wrong but didnt we sell off our assets in a bad food deal too. It wasnt just SMG that did the loan sharking I think Aramark too.
Its not like they were bad companies the Pens needed money to keep the team together. The deals were not "horribly one sided", the Pens did get a ton of money up front. The issue was that in the next years the Penguins then had zero money coming in from them. I should clarify that of course SMG and Aramark still got the better of the deals but its not as bad as it sounded. It just took away their ability to make money in the long run.
I don't remember any Baldwin deals with Aramark. SMG was getting all revenues from parking and concessions and I believe SMG was contracting out the concessions to Aramark themselves, not the Penguins. The other long-term killer deal he swung was to Fox Sports Pittsburgh, giving away all arena advertising revenues and marketing rights to them for some upfront cash.
It doesn't really matter because the poit is correct in that the Pens sold yearly cash for upfront money. But smg, Aramark, and parking (city of Pgh) are all separate. The city did and always had run the building and I think that was the problem. and that is why gettin the new arena was a big deal beyon the norm. City "owns" but pens now run and hire who they want, get more overall money.
-
BurghersAndDogsSports
- ECHL'er

-
- Posts: 1,363
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 10:42 am
- Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Return to Pittsburgh Penguins
Users browsing this forum: atkearns, Big Easy Pens Fan, CERV96, demondg1, Idoit40fans, johnnews, MarioLives, pfim, PghSkins, sdadowski, Steve Dave, Take the Body Shoot the Puck, thepittman and 48 guests