Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf

MWB wrote:BurghersAndDogsSports wrote:MWB wrote:BurghersAndDogsSports wrote:If someone agrees with the ACA, that is your opinion but idiots like John Stewart spouting factless rhetoric as if this CEO is making this all up or it's not a big issue in general is a huge part of the problem.
What was he factually inaccurate about?
My point is he is not presenting an unbiased overall look at the effects of the ACA and people constantly refer to Stewart. He has come up multiple times just on the last several pages of this thread. He bashes folks in similar fashion as if "common sense, rich guys just wants to get richer how can he think we are all this stupid".
So he's not actually spouting factless rhetoric, he's just stating his opinion. And people who agree with his opinion use it as a way of bringing that angle up.

BurghersAndDogsSports wrote:MWB wrote:BurghersAndDogsSports wrote:MWB wrote:BurghersAndDogsSports wrote:If someone agrees with the ACA, that is your opinion but idiots like John Stewart spouting factless rhetoric as if this CEO is making this all up or it's not a big issue in general is a huge part of the problem.
What was he factually inaccurate about?
My point is he is not presenting an unbiased overall look at the effects of the ACA and people constantly refer to Stewart. He has come up multiple times just on the last several pages of this thread. He bashes folks in similar fashion as if "common sense, rich guys just wants to get richer how can he think we are all this stupid".
So he's not actually spouting factless rhetoric, he's just stating his opinion. And people who agree with his opinion use it as a way of bringing that angle up.
Lol.
Semantics of a word. Awesome. As if someone's opinion on a news show is ok when his followers state it as fact.

BurghersAndDogsSports wrote:once Barry won the primary he turned his focus to the profitable company healthcare plan with a minimum profit pay or play system that in my estimation was a solid start to his entire class warfare campaign that has been so effective.


BurghersAndDogsSports wrote:[quote=ndDogsSports"]
If someone agrees with the ACA, that is your opinion but idiots like John Stewart spouting factless rhetoric as if this CEO is making this all up or it's not a big issue in general is a huge part of the problem.

tifosi77 wrote:BurghersAndDogsSports wrote:once Barry won the primary he turned his focus to the profitable company healthcare plan with a minimum profit pay or play system that in my estimation was a solid start to his entire class warfare campaign that has been so effective.
His first public comment endorsing the idea of the mandate was in July 2009, after he had been president for seven months, and some four months after the legislative meetings began.



Tico Rick wrote:I get the news I need from the weather report.

npv708 wrote:Tico Rick wrote:I get the news I need from the weather report.
I prefer a nice blend of Mother Jones, the ACLU newsletter, Michael Moore's twitter feed, and Chris Matthew's hairdresser for all my news.


Tico Rick wrote:McCain skips Benghazi briefing:
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/11/15/mccain-skips-benghazi-briefing-gets-testy-when-questioned-by-cnn/?hpt=hp_t1
(Sorry if this was posted before; I've just been sporadically checking this thread lately.)

columbia wrote:Here's what I've learned today..
LGP posters: The AHCA sucks and I might lose my insurance
The universe: Why is that?
LGP posters: My company claims that they might not be able to afford it.
The universe: I see, so you get health insurance, but not everyone at your company does. Why do you deserve it, but they don't?
LGP posters: crickets.youtube

Tico Rick wrote:npv708 wrote:Tico Rick wrote:I get the news I need from the weather report.
I prefer a nice blend of Mother Jones, the ACLU newsletter, Michael Moore's twitter feed, and Chris Matthew's hairdresser for all my news.
Well that sounds fair and balanced to me.


columbia wrote:Actually, we're talking about what type of country we want to live in.

npv708 wrote:Tico Rick wrote:McCain skips Benghazi briefing:
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/11/15/mccain-skips-benghazi-briefing-gets-testy-when-questioned-by-cnn/?hpt=hp_t1
(Sorry if this was posted before; I've just been sporadically checking this thread lately.)
I love the headline from Foreign Policy magazine...
"Republicans skip Benghazi hearing; complain about lack of information on Benghazi"
http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts ... n_benghazi
According to a Democratic aide on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, only three of the eight GOP members of the committee attended the two hour briefing that ran from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. ET. By contrast, seven of the nine Democratic members were there.

npv708 wrote:Tico Rick wrote:npv708 wrote:Tico Rick wrote:I get the news I need from the weather report.
I prefer a nice blend of Mother Jones, the ACLU newsletter, Michael Moore's twitter feed, and Chris Matthew's hairdresser for all my news.
Well that sounds fair and balanced to me.
Yeah, I know, i like to make sure I only get my information from non-partisan, independent sources.

Tico Rick wrote:npv708 wrote:Tico Rick wrote:npv708 wrote:Tico Rick wrote:I get the news I need from the weather report.
I prefer a nice blend of Mother Jones, the ACLU newsletter, Michael Moore's twitter feed, and Chris Matthew's hairdresser for all my news.
Well that sounds fair and balanced to me.
Yeah, I know, i like to make sure I only get my information from non-partisan, independent sources.
Wait, are you implying that the Weather Channel is biased?

npv708 wrote:columbia wrote:Actually, we're talking about what type of country we want to live in.
Its business talk...you wouldn't understand.

BurghersAndDogsSports wrote:MWB wrote:BurghersAndDogsSports wrote:MWB wrote:BurghersAndDogsSports wrote:If someone agrees with the ACA, that is your opinion but idiots like John Stewart spouting factless rhetoric as if this CEO is making this all up or it's not a big issue in general is a huge part of the problem.
What was he factually inaccurate about?
My point is he is not presenting an unbiased overall look at the effects of the ACA and people constantly refer to Stewart. He has come up multiple times just on the last several pages of this thread. He bashes folks in similar fashion as if "common sense, rich guys just wants to get richer how can he think we are all this stupid".
So he's not actually spouting factless rhetoric, he's just stating his opinion. And people who agree with his opinion use it as a way of bringing that angle up.
Lol.
Semantics of a word. Awesome. As if someone's opinion on a news show is ok when his followers state it as fact.

npv708 wrote:Are you telling me Heavy Sprinkles doesn't sound like a left-leaning conspiracy to you?


BurghersAndDogsSports wrote:npv708 wrote:columbia wrote:Actually, we're talking about what type of country we want to live in.
Its business talk...you wouldn't understand.
Im sorry, I thought we were talking specifically about the effects of the ACA on businesses since the convo started with Papa Johns.
Asking what people want globally or asking about the specific effects of something are two completely different convos.

Tico Rick wrote:npv708 wrote:Are you telling me Heavy Sprinkles doesn't sound like a left-leaning conspiracy to you?
Larry Sprinkle, my weatherman in Charlotte:
I kid you not.

Users browsing this forum: Godric and 1 guest