Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf

DropEmJayBird wrote:The call has nothing to do with whether the ball crossed the goal line. It was the opinion of the official, and mine to when seeing it the first time, that as the PSU player goes to extend the ball, he loses control. This happens around the 1 yard line or so I would say.
That's why the ball is so far forward in his hands. To me, it looked like in his thrust to move it forward, he lost it, and his hands were just following the ball at that point, going with the motion so to speak.






mac5155 wrote:was the block on Mauti as dirty as my FB feed makes it out to be?

Ben Jones @Ben_Jones88
O'Brien won't give a "Yes" or "No" to coaching next season. Says people gave legs to a story that isn't there, but doesn't exactly say no.
Ben Jones @Ben_Jones88
If Bill O'Brien knows he is staying, he has to say so. Losing him this offseason would hurt Penn State more than sanctions would.
Ben Jones @Ben_Jones88
Know some of you think the media is making a mountain out of a molehill, but it isn't a trick question and he has given nonspecific answers
Ben Jones @Ben_Jones88
He has a contract for the better part of a decade, if him not committing to year two isn't at least suspicious then I don't know what is.
None of this necessarily means O'Brien is out the door.
It just means he won't lie. He won't sit there one day like Nick Saban did with the Miami fans and tell them he was absolutely staying and a few days later sign a lucrative contract in Tuscaloosa, Ala.
O'Brien is not going to hem himself in. He's not going to diagram a whiteboard when he doesn't know the package of possible plays yet.
That's the way the guy is. That's what makes him so good at what he does. And we're all just going to have to live with it.











count2infinity wrote:I honestly didn't think they'd call it a touchdown. Look at Zwinak's face after he drops it. He though it was incomplete as well.



count2infinity wrote:i don't think there's any sort of conspiracy here. in the nebraska game it was a very very close call. the call on the field was fumble, so that's what was upheld. here it's the same thing. it was so close that it really depended on what the call on the field was. it was called a touchdown so that's what was upheld.
relantel wrote:Anyone else thought the replay call in the 2nd half went Penn State's way solely as make=up for the Nebraska call? .



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests