Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
In addition to revenue split and player contract rules, the sides need to work out how to pay for the damage caused by the lockout.
Azkar wrote:In addition to revenue split and player contract rules, the sides need to work out how to pay for the damage caused by the lockout.
TIME MACHINE
tfrizz wrote:Chris Johnston @reporterchris
I'm told the NHLPA's proposal included player contract rights.
David Pagnotta @TheFourthPeriod
Between addressing player contracting issues and the core economics (moving to an HRR percentage base), the NHLPA took big steps today.
So aside from the financials sounding fair, it seems to be a fairly complete proposal. If nothing else, this is a big step in the right direction.
MRandall25 wrote:If total HRR is 3.3 billion, 182 million is 5.5% of that, going to the owners.
If they can't accept that, then we're ****. There's no reason they shouldn't work with that.
Bioshock wrote:"@aaronward_nhl: "NHLPA proposal took NHL structure, 50/50 in year 1; Only difference,took $211M (make whole) to $393M over 4 yrs"
MRandall25 wrote:If total HRR is 3.3 billion, 182 million is 5.5% of that, going to the owners.
If they can't accept that, then we're ****. There's no reason they shouldn't work with that.
Gaucho wrote:Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie
Also in PA proposal: For on-ice discipline, appeal process to neutral arbitrator or panel of 3 arbitrators (one NHL, one NHLPA, one neutral)
Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie
NHLPA proposes elimination of re-entry waivers and the four-recall rule post trade deadline.
tfrizz wrote:Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC
NHLPA change to AHL contracts is cap hit count on any player earning more than $1 million. But, would not count against HRR.
That's fair enough. It would let teams offer a one-way deal to a fringe guy without getting burned, but prevents teams from burying players in the AHL.
tfrizz wrote:Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC
To me, best omen is that NHL has yet to publicly respond and remained quiet.
Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie
The NHLPA breakdown of the $393M it is seeking for Make Whole is as follows: Year 1: 182M, Year 2: 128M, Year 3: 72M, Year 4: 11M.
no name wrote:tfrizz wrote:Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC
To me, best omen is that NHL has yet to publicly respond and remained quiet.
Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie
The NHLPA breakdown of the $393M it is seeking for Make Whole is as follows: Year 1: 182M, Year 2: 128M, Year 3: 72M, Year 4: 11M.
As positive as this sounds, it really is no different that the 50/50 split being gradually put in place. Constructive CBA wording. Not to be a negative nancy, but i won't be happy til the deal is signed.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests