pcm wrote:After 4 seasons in a row of disappointment, most NHL coaches would not have the job for year 5. This being season 4, I'd say his job is on the line.
But let's hope it doesn't come to that.
Disappointment?
Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
pcm wrote:After 4 seasons in a row of disappointment, most NHL coaches would not have the job for year 5. This being season 4, I'd say his job is on the line.
But let's hope it doesn't come to that.





Steve Dave wrote: and I don't think Tangradi has the speed to be effective on a shutdown line.



MRandall25 wrote:When are people going to learn that "heavy favorites" =/= automatic Stanley Cup win?






MRandall25 wrote:Who's saying they're taking the same approach?

Lt. Dish wrote:MRandall25 wrote:Who's saying they're taking the same approach?
Who's saying there was an actual approach?![]()

penny lane wrote:Lt. Dish wrote:MRandall25 wrote:Who's saying they're taking the same approach?
Who's saying there was an actual approach?![]()
![]()
from regular season games to play-off games; didn't see a change in the approach to playing the flyers.
we'll see if that has changed- other than just hoping pens talent has a great day.








Gaucho wrote:Dave Molinari @MolinariPG
Bylsma, on Paul Martin's value: “Paul is a good hockey player. You just ask around the league. You just ask the players he plays against."
Brooks Orpik, discussing Paul Martin's 2011-12 performance: "I think he was just as disappointed as anybody else last year in how he played"
Bylsma says Paul Martin will remain in a top-4 role and, in tomorrow's P-G, identifies a surprising candidate to be his new defense partner.
I'm guessing Bortuzzo?
Or maybe it's Tanger.
Dave Molinari @MolinariPG
For those guessing/asking, no, I won't divulge Martin's potential defense partner. Would kind of defeat the purpose of teasing the story.


Gaucho wrote:If he won't say it, what's the point in using twitter?

penny lane wrote:Gaucho wrote:If he won't say it, what's the point in using twitter?
it's a tease tweet!![]()
DM did rule out Jesus as the potential playing partner.
coach dan can't be thinking of putting a wbs D man with #7, can he?

Users browsing this forum: Admin, It'sagreatdayforhockey!, joopen, Scate, skullman80, Staggy and 28 guests