Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf

* New restrictions on assault weapons
* Stiffer penalties for using a gun to commit a crime
* New limits on the number of bullets in a gun magazine

shafnutz05 wrote:Another 9/11 is unlikely to happen because, in the extraordinarily unlikely case of a hijacking, the cockpit doors are sealed and people would never let them take control of the plane again knowing what we now know.

PensFanInDC wrote:shafnutz05 wrote:Another 9/11 is unlikely to happen because, in the extraordinarily unlikely case of a hijacking, the cockpit doors are sealed and people would never let them take control of the plane again knowing what we now know.
Disagree. I think another 9/11 is inevitable.



shafnutz05 wrote:PensFanInDC wrote:shafnutz05 wrote:Another 9/11 is unlikely to happen because, in the extraordinarily unlikely case of a hijacking, the cockpit doors are sealed and people would never let them take control of the plane again knowing what we now know.
Disagree. I think another 9/11 is inevitable.
Another major terror attack is inevitable. When I say another "9/11", I am talking about multiple airliners being taken over and flown into different high priority targets. That is unlikely to happen again.
I agree that another mass attack will happen somewhere


columbia wrote:If the people who lodged the threat were trying to play into the people with guns are scary mantra, they have succeeded.

BurghersAndDogsSports wrote:Im not being a smart a-- but would any of that really help? Im being serious, I dont have a lot of knowledge of the statistics.
I do know that I read recently other than Chicago, Detroit, DC etc crimes are way down across the country.
Since people obsess over the sensationalized crimes, I dont see any of this actually helping. It seems it may help more with
"normal" criminal activity I guess, but nobody seems to care about that anyways.
* New restrictions on assault weapons
* Stiffer penalties for using a gun to commit a crime
* New limits on the number of bullets in a gun magazine
columbia wrote:If the people who lodged the threat were trying to play into the people with guns are scary mantra, they have succeeded.



PensFanInDC wrote:Not sure what is funny about that.

shafnutz05 wrote:PensFanInDC wrote:Not sure what is funny about that.
The "LOL" was one of those "laughing to keep from raging" things.


Gaucho wrote:Why in God's name would you want to see this?



mac5155 wrote:its not funny to me that the kids are starving, and homeless. its hilarious that she wants "somebody to be held accountable and somebody needs to pay"



Gaucho wrote:What about the fathers?


Users browsing this forum: CERV96, skullman80 and 1 guest