Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
RxBandit66 wrote:The main concern for me is not the top 6 but the bottom 6, especially if Kennedy skates with Geno and Neal. Sutter and Cooke are great bottom 6 guys, as good as anyone in the league in their roles. But beyond that, there is not much grit or speed. Adams looked awful last season, totally washed up and slow. There's just not enough grit. Jeffrey and Tangradi have a shot but they are not that physical or fast. Perhaps a player like Wichester may be more of what they need rather than another old slow guy like Knuble or Malone? Just a thought.
meow wrote:RxBandit66 wrote:The main concern for me is not the top 6 but the bottom 6, especially if Kennedy skates with Geno and Neal. Sutter and Cooke are great bottom 6 guys, as good as anyone in the league in their roles. But beyond that, there is not much grit or speed. Adams looked awful last season, totally washed up and slow. There's just not enough grit. Jeffrey and Tangradi have a shot but they are not that physical or fast. Perhaps a player like Wichester may be more of what they need rather than another old slow guy like Knuble or Malone? Just a thought.
Glass has speed and is a terrific role player.
RxBandit66 wrote:The main concern for me is not the top 6 but the bottom 6, especially if Kennedy skates with Geno and Neal. Sutter and Cooke are great bottom 6 guys, as good as anyone in the league in their roles. But beyond that, there is not much grit or speed. Adams looked awful last season, totally washed up and slow. There's just not enough grit. Jeffrey and Tangradi have a shot but they are not that physical or fast. Perhaps a player like Wichester may be more of what they need rather than another old slow guy like Knuble or Malone? Just a thought.
DelPen wrote:Malone-Malkin-Neal
HockeyDaddy wrote:I must be the only guy here that thought Tangradi was great against the Flyers in a fourth line role?
The Snapshot wrote:Is Eric Fehr a better alternative to Tangradi and Kennedy? He has at least a little track record in the NHL and was hurt much of last year.
netwolf wrote:The Snapshot wrote:Is Eric Fehr a better alternative to Tangradi and Kennedy? He has at least a little track record in the NHL and was hurt much of last year.
Maybe, but enough of an upgrade to use of their last spot under the 50 man contract limit (assuming it's still in the new CBA)? I'm not sure. We would have definitely won the Water Classic at Heinz Field with him though.
AlexPKeaton wrote:I'd take Malone for the PK alone. I tried to block the Flyer's series from my brain but I seem to recall the PK getting smoked left and right.
AlexPKeaton wrote:I'd take Malone for the PK alone. I tried to block the Flyer's series from my brain but I seem to recall the PK getting smoked left and right.
netwolf wrote:I don't know why I'm making a serious reply considering they came from this Insiderrrrrrrr fraud (http://blogs.edmontonjournal.com/2012/0 ... s-to-know/), but I can't help myself...
SoupOrSam wrote:Hockeyy Insiderr @HockeyyInsiderr.
The egg in my egg mcmuffin is more reliable as an insider. #donedeal.
How much is the 40 points Malone gets really worth? The max I spend on him is 3mil. Doubt he takes it.
Users browsing this forum: E-Ramone and 28 guests