Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf

columbia wrote:I don't know if it's possible to win a Stanley Cup with either of them on the ice, so maybe it just doesn't matter.



helmespc wrote:columbia wrote:I don't know if it's possible to win a Stanley Cup with either of them on the ice, so maybe it just doesn't matter.
People said the same thing about Rob Scuderi....




offsides wrote:thepittman wrote:We have a good D-core, that Flyers series was a fluke
Sure hope you're right, but I just don't see it. Besides the flyer nonsense, our D was horrible the last month of the season. I still think this season's success will be determined by our D and goal tending. To me, the offense is more than adequate.

shmenguin wrote:helmespc wrote:columbia wrote:I don't know if it's possible to win a Stanley Cup with either of them on the ice, so maybe it just doesn't matter.
People said the same thing about Rob Scuderi....
Not in 2009 they didn't.

Gaucho wrote:And I guess only a fool would consider the Pens a good team.

The Current One wrote:Gaucho wrote:And I guess only a fool would consider the Pens a good team.
Yes, they are a good team. But a true Stanley Cup contender? Not with Lovejoy and Engelland playing on a regular basis. Compare the Pens defense to teams such as the Rangers and Bruins, and it's not even close.

helmespc wrote:shmenguin wrote:helmespc wrote:columbia wrote:I don't know if it's possible to win a Stanley Cup with either of them on the ice, so maybe it just doesn't matter.
People said the same thing about Rob Scuderi....
Not in 2009 they didn't.
It's kind of irrelevent whether they said it in 2007 or 2009, hence the term "never". I'm not saying that its an entirely relevant comparison, but people did have the same attitude toward Scuderi when he was at relatively the same point in his career.

fair enough. but we're in "win now" mode as opposed to rebuild mode when scuderi was green and sucky.

helmespc wrote:fair enough. but we're in "win now" mode as opposed to rebuild mode when scuderi was green and sucky.
Mostly agreed, although I'm kind of in the "screw 2013" boat, so I'm not all that excited about selling the farm to win this year, if it means weakening next year's team.


RisslingsMissingTeeth wrote:I guess everything will clear up next week but I think we're kidding ourselves if we don't think that the D will include Lovejoy and Engy opening night. They know the system and they're vets.

Idoit40fans wrote:To have a logjam at a position, you have to be good at that position.

RisslingsMissingTeeth wrote:I guess everything will clear up next week but I think we're kidding ourselves if we don't think that the D will include Lovejoy and Engy opening night. They know the system and they're vets.

penmyst wrote:Idoit40fans wrote:To have a logjam at a position, you have to be good at that position.
Will somebody tell Pirates fans this?

mikey287 wrote:Martin did some of his best work in New Jersey paired with a somewhat sluggish, physical defensive defenseman in Bryce Salvador (a career third pairing guy), for reference. Conversely, it could be the style of play the Penguins employ that is causing his hiccups, not his partner.



Idoit40fans wrote:
Who thinks they have a glut of talent at any position?


Users browsing this forum: dman66, murphydump55, neophool, sergei, themadstork and 65 guests