Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf

DudeMan2766 wrote:Hey all! The Pens lost a game. Be sure not to discuss it lest you be labeled a bridge jumper, a negative negativer, and the like. Also, seeding doesn't matter, last year proved that.



Steve Dave wrote:HCDB drawing up the old 2 goals in 8.9 second play.

DudeMan2766 wrote:DudeMan2766 wrote:Hey all! The Pens lost a game. Be sure not to discuss it lest you be labeled a bridge jumper, a negative negativer, and the like. Also, seeding doesn't matter, last year proved that.





offsides wrote:Steve Dave wrote:HCDB drawing up the old 2 goals in 8.9 second play.

Gaucho wrote:DudeMan2766 wrote:DudeMan2766 wrote:Hey all! The Pens lost a game. Be sure not to discuss it lest you be labeled a bridge jumper, a negative negativer, and the like. Also, seeding doesn't matter, last year proved that.
yawn...




Gaucho wrote:Need a winger and a center for Boychuk.




PensFanInDC wrote:4-2 in 6 games in 9 days. Ill take it.

SoupOrSam wrote:I think if there is any disappointment in Sutter is he does not make linemates better. Staal made Kennedy look pretty good a lot of times. Same with Cooke. I think we all knew that when we picked him up. At least the 3rd line "duties" of his game is not a drop-off. Cheaper too. That's how I look at the entire thing.

nocera wrote:PensFanInDC wrote:4-2 in 6 games in 9 days. Ill take it.
You stop that.

The U wrote:Hope we don't see them in the playoffs. Bad matchup and boring.

AlexPKeaton wrote:mikey287 wrote:To be fair, the Penguins were "trapping" as much or more than the Devils in the first two periods I thought. We sit back and play a 1-2-2 when we dump it and feels there's a less than 50-50 chance we can win possession. The Devils collapse back deeper to their net than we do, but that's not trapping.
Collapsing back towards the net is a strategy that has been effective against the pens for many years now.

columbia wrote:SoupOrSam wrote:I think if there is any disappointment in Sutter is he does not make linemates better. Staal made Kennedy look pretty good a lot of times. Same with Cooke. I think we all knew that when we picked him up. At least the 3rd line "duties" of his game is not a drop-off. Cheaper too. That's how I look at the entire thing.
Why would you have assumed that Sutter was/is a comparable player or be able to have that effect?

Users browsing this forum: FreeCandy44, knives of ice, npv708, Old Used Pylon, pens#1 and 36 guests