Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf







Fire0nice228 wrote:If they make offsides reviewable we'll have 10 times a game where we have to go to the booth for review.. be worse than football. It sucks when it happens and it leads to a goal but the flow of the game would be killed IMO

Fire0nice228 wrote:If they make offsides reviewable we'll have 10 times a game where we have to go to the booth for review.. be worse than football. It sucks when it happens and it leads to a goal but the flow of the game would be killed IMO

Pitt87 wrote:Fire0nice228 wrote:If they make offsides reviewable we'll have 10 times a game where we have to go to the booth for review.. be worse than football. It sucks when it happens and it leads to a goal but the flow of the game would be killed IMO
Most games don't see 10 goals scored. If they can review goaltender interference, they should be able to review if a guy was offsides.








relantel wrote:wow. that was bad. (just saw a replay). Much more blatant than the Briere play last year.
Duchene knew he was offside, but was quoted as saying he was told Nashville played it back in, which isn't supported by the replay.



Idoit40fans wrote:Haha you couldn't do that unless you had rf tags on the front and back of each skate blade


Staggy wrote:Pitt87 wrote:Fire0nice228 wrote:If they make offsides reviewable we'll have 10 times a game where we have to go to the booth for review.. be worse than football. It sucks when it happens and it leads to a goal but the flow of the game would be killed IMO
Most games don't see 10 goals scored. If they can review goaltender interference, they should be able to review if a guy was offsides.
So what are you going to do, every time someone is close to being offsides you let the play run its entire course and then after the whistle go back to see if the last 2 minutes of play even counted? Seems unrealistic and horribly inconvenient.



Users browsing this forum: Das boot and 1 guest