Official Gameday Thread - Penguins vs Flyers - 20/2/2013

[Rocco]

Review that.

[tunez33]

goall such a goal

[shafnutz05]

THAT'S A GOAL

[sharpshootr55]

Can't tell if its in, overhead is inconclusive.

[Geezer]

That looks like a goal

[DelPen]

Might not be enough evidence to prove it 100% but that's a goal.

[NashvilleCat]

Might have been a goal - but they can't say it definitely is.

[Froggy]

no way this counts. no way you can tell 100%

[Rocco]

I don't know if there's enough to call that a goal but that sure looks like it was over the line.

[Orlando Penguin]

Pretty inconclusive there, unfortunately. Hell of a setup for Malkin.

[shafnutz05]

nope, won't be overturned

[iWonTheCup87]

probably in but unless you can see it for sure it doesnt matter

it wont be a goal because you cant see it

[Pitt87]

that should be a suspension....dirtbag Flyer scumbags. Enjoy bleeding you asswipe

He should be, but he might just be sent down instead...

[offsides]

THAT'S A GOAL

No way they will overturn that..............I think

[DelPen]

no way this counts. no way you can tell 100%

I can almost see the whole puck on the over head past the bar but maybe not enough for a goal.

[nocera]

If I've said it once, this is the first time I've said it, there should be some sort of sensor in the puck that can tell when it completely crosses the goal line. If they can make it have a glowing comet tail, why can't they do that?

[Pitt87]

The way the puck turns... its in. No good angle though.

[sharpshootr55]

I agree with that call, as much as the angle behind Malkin makes the puck look in the net.

[DelPen]

Can't be upset over that call.

[Gaucho]

That's not even close to being a goal.

[Matthew Monstar]

It was a goal , but couldn't prove due to lack of camera angles.

I hate it but I understand I s'pose.

[sharpshootr55]

GENO!

[Be1isarius89]

Woohoo

[shafnutz05]

YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

[Rocco]

Justice.