Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
Rylan wrote:FHCMT should be the Jack Adams winner this year. He is a beast.
MRandall25 wrote:Rylan wrote:FHCMT should be the Jack Adams winner this year. He is a beast.
Paul MacLean has a solid argument to win it too. No Spezza, Karlsson, and they're still 5th in the conference.
Kovy27 wrote:MRandall25 wrote:Rylan wrote:FHCMT should be the Jack Adams winner this year. He is a beast.
Paul MacLean has a solid argument to win it too. No Spezza, Karlsson, and they're still 5th in the conference.
It is Paul MacLean's to lose. Bruce Boudreau should be in the talks, as well.
tfrizz wrote:I'm glad to see Boudreau having success in Anaheim while the Capitals toil in misery. I mean... I always enjoy some Capitals suckitude, it's just way better knowing that they fired Boudreau like 15 months ago and now he's in the talks for the Jack Adams (again).
Rylan wrote:The reason I am against MacLean is the fact that OT loses are the only reason his team is relevant. They can't score and that will bite them in the ass. They are playing stellar defense and Anderson is the Vezina winner to this point, but I can't give MacLean the Jack Adams for a team that should be out of the playoffs but a broken points system has his team still being relevant.
Rylan wrote:FHCMT should be the Jack Adams winner this year. He is a beast.
Rylan wrote:The reason I am against MacLean is the fact that OT loses are the only reason his team is relevant. They can't score and that will bite them in the ass. They are playing stellar defense and Anderson is the Vezina winner to this point, but I can't give MacLean the Jack Adams for a team that should be out of the playoffs but a broken points system has his team still being relevant.
Kovy27 wrote:Rylan wrote:The reason I am against MacLean is the fact that OT loses are the only reason his team is relevant. They can't score and that will bite them in the ass. They are playing stellar defense and Anderson is the Vezina winner to this point, but I can't give MacLean the Jack Adams for a team that should be out of the playoffs but a broken points system has his team still being relevant.
Ehhhh...LA last year had dominant goaltending and couldn't really score. In fact, that might have been the most boring Stanley Cup Final in history.
meecrofilm wrote:Rylan wrote:The reason I am against MacLean is the fact that OT loses are the only reason his team is relevant. They can't score and that will bite them in the ass. They are playing stellar defense and Anderson is the Vezina winner to this point, but I can't give MacLean the Jack Adams for a team that should be out of the playoffs but a broken points system has his team still being relevant.
The year that DB won it, didn't we have an absurd amount of shootout wins down the stretch? Yeah I know, technically "wins," but still.
Pitt87 wrote:Rylan wrote:FHCMT should be the Jack Adams winner this year. He is a beast.
This... what he's done with practically the same team as last year is at least as impressive as what HCDB did without Sid & Geno.
count2infinity wrote:should I change the thread title to "Who's going to win the Jack Adams?"
Rylan wrote:I honestly have no idea why I degloved the thread....
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests