DudeMan2766 wrote:Heyman with his ponytail untied looks like that cartoon The Critic
IT STINKS!
Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
DudeMan2766 wrote:Heyman with his ponytail untied looks like that cartoon The Critic




It's sad that 4 out of the 6 guys that will main event Mania are just guys that only wrestle once or twice a year. The company just can't build stars



nocera wrote:The biggest problem with Mania right now is the WWE champion is rarely on TV. The most prestigious title is a non factor.

TheHammer24 wrote:nocera wrote:The biggest problem with Mania right now is the WWE champion is rarely on TV. The most prestigious title is a non factor.
I actually find more problematic that it's a completely underwhelming match. There's no buildup because he's not on TV, but also the match is not seriously in question. Cena wins. Add that the two won't put on a good match, and who cares?


skullman80 wrote:3 out of the top 4 matches at mania, have winners that are stone cold locks.
Cena will beat Rock
HHH will beat Lesnar
Taker will beat Punk
That's what makes Mania not exciting to me so far, 3 out of the 4 top matches there is no intrigue on who wins or loses.


TheHammer24 wrote:I think the kafabe egregiousness of Punk's actions require 'Taker winning. But who care? Even if Punk is the darling of the smarks, it will still be enjoyable to watch the good guy vindicate the death of the beloved manager.

nocera wrote:skullman80 wrote:3 out of the top 4 matches at mania, have winners that are stone cold locks.
Cena will beat Rock
HHH will beat Lesnar
Taker will beat Punk
That's what makes Mania not exciting to me so far, 3 out of the 4 top matches there is no intrigue on who wins or loses.
I'm not so sure of HHH going over. His buddies Flair and HBK both "retired" due to losing a WM match. All he'd have to give up is 2 or 3 matches a year.


Spangler wrote:I just read a quote from an IGN recap of RAW (the author actually apologized to Pittsburgh about how bad the show was). Anyway...It's sad that 4 out of the 6 guys that will main event Mania are just guys that only wrestle once or twice a year. The company just can't build stars
That is a huge problem right there.
Should you be building characters to make people want to pay money to see them? You have a a group like 3MB, who's only purpose is to job to everyone and be a total joke. Why not actually do something with them to get people to take them seriously. I'm not saying any of those guys are going to be the next Cena, it's just an example of roles that are doomed for failure. Likely, Fandango will serve the same purpose.

JS© wrote:Spangler wrote:I just read a quote from an IGN recap of RAW (the author actually apologized to Pittsburgh about how bad the show was). Anyway...It's sad that 4 out of the 6 guys that will main event Mania are just guys that only wrestle once or twice a year. The company just can't build stars
That is a huge problem right there.
Should you be building characters to make people want to pay money to see them? You have a a group like 3MB, who's only purpose is to job to everyone and be a total joke. Why not actually do something with them to get people to take them seriously. I'm not saying any of those guys are going to be the next Cena, it's just an example of roles that are doomed for failure. Likely, Fandango will serve the same purpose.
He's doomed because you're pronouncing his name wrong. It's Faaaaaaaaaaan....daaaaaannnnn....
I think we had a similar discussion here a few months ago or maybe I read it on another board. Not only is the WWE not developing stars, but your next tier of stars are already in their mid 30s to early 40s with no real potential on the horizon. That's not saying that any member from The Shield or even 3MB could break out at any second (who I believe are all 29 and younger), but with the current pattern, nobody really advances unless a) Cena takes a role that involves not headlining a PPV, or b) Vince/HHH decides to put full-time roster members in the main event (not you, Cena) instead of guys who shows up on RAW 5x a year.


skullman80 wrote:Ambrose should be a future world champion after the Shield runs its course if they play their cards right.

Froggy wrote:I totally disagree with that. Punk and Bryan are still big names. If HHH, the rock, the undertaker, etc ate going to be on a card at this point, they are going to be at the top of the card on a special event.
After they are gone for good, you still have guys like punk and Bryan... A few more years of cena... Other big name vets like big show and Seamus... Then you have guys like Ambrose and Cesaro ready to step up. Plus, the current crop of nxt is honestly basically the best guys on the Indie circuit for the last 5-10 years. 4 or 5 potential superstars out of there.
I'm actually pretty optimistic about the next couple of years






Users browsing this forum: DudeMan2766, jimreb and 6 guests