PensFanInDC wrote:There shouldn't be a state definition of marriage either
When the team further untangled the web of ownership, it found much of it tracked back to a "super-entity" of 147 even more tightly knit companies - all of their ownership was held by other members of the super-entity - that controlled 40 per cent of the total wealth in the network. "In effect, less than 1 per cent of the companies were able to control 40 per cent of the entire network," says Glattfelder. Most were financial institutions. The top 20 included Barclays Bank, JPMorgan Chase & Co, and The Goldman Sachs Group.
John Driffill of the University of London, a macroeconomics expert, says the value of the analysis is not just to see if a small number of people controls the global economy, but rather its insights into economic stability.
Concentration of power is not good or bad in itself, says the Zurich team, but the core's tight interconnections could be. As the world learned in 2008, such networks are unstable. "If one [company] suffers distress," says Glattfelder, "this propagates."
columbia wrote:Revealed – the capitalist network that ruins the world
It's especially embarrassing when there are things like GR's post going on.
GaryRissling wrote:Visualization of every drone strike in Pakistan since 2004.
shafnutz05 wrote:My Facebook wall is absolutely buried by those red equal sign thingies that people are posting.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests