Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
DelPen wrote:Why aren't 07-08 and 08-09 on the list? I'd still take 91-92 but I'd consider 08-09 as my #2 choice.
taz71 wrote:92-93 best team we have ever had except maybe this one. I think the injury to kevin stevens was devastating for the team and may have been why we lost to the isles that year. I think this years team is a close second depending on injuries.
shmenguin wrote:can i take the 93 team, but swap barasso with a parking cone?
bh wrote:Was Tommy B really that bad? I watched the playoffs, but I was like 10 years old and didn't have an eye for hockey back then. I grew up thinking he was a good but not great kind of jerkish goalie.
bh wrote:Was Tommy B really that bad? I watched the playoffs, but I was like 10 years old and didn't have an eye for hockey back then. I grew up thinking he was a good but not great kind of jerkish goalie.
taz71 wrote:92-93 best team we have ever had except maybe this one. I think the injury to kevin stevens was devastating for the team and may have been why we lost to the isles that year. I think this years team is a close second depending on injuries.
shmenguin wrote:can i take the 93 team, but swap barasso with a parking cone?
Henry Hank wrote:....
The 92-93 team certainly is a cautionary tale about what could be in the future for the current team. Just because the team looks amazing now doesn't really mean anything.
...
bh wrote:Was Tommy B really that bad? I watched the playoffs, but I was like 10 years old and didn't have an eye for hockey back then. I grew up thinking he was a good but not great kind of jerkish goalie.
Users browsing this forum: Badger Bob, Ericf, Steve and 28 guests