DocEmrick wrote:Terminator 2 was a cash-in cheesy action flick with horrible lines like "Let me try mine," and the others. Furlong's acting is horrendous. Terminator ends perfectly, with the viewer to draw their own conclusions about judgement day, etc.
That being said, I still enjoy all of the films (yes even 3), I just think Terminator would have worked fine as a stand-alone movie.
Froggy wrote:Cracked.com had a video a couple months ago pointing out why T2 was a great movie, but a terrible sequel because it broke the rules established by the first movie. pretty interesting observation.
eddysnake wrote:tifosi77 wrote:Shyster wrote:Highlander 2.
I'd say all three film sequels were crap, but the TV series was actually pretty cool.
When I saw the 4th film in theaters, the female lead was in the crowd with a bunch of her girlfriends. Every time she was on screen they'd cheer. It was cute the first time, and maybe the second time. By the 45 minute mark of the film, it was a bit of a different story.
tv show was pretty cool. first highlander is one of my favorites, the Kurgan is such an awesome bad guy (clancy brown is so cool, him and Brian Thompson (slasher in Cobra) always terrified me). The sequels were terrible (although I did like Endgame somewhat). I've always thought the concept could create a lot of great stories, but here we are.
bhaw wrote:The Marine 2 because The Marine 1 should never have been made or released for human eyes to see to begin with.
Users browsing this forum: ajh2298 and 7 guests