Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
Sarcastic wrote:http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/12/18923839-nsa-director-dozens-of-terrorist-plots-foiled-by-surveillance-programs
NSA director: 'DOZENS' of terrorist plots foiled by surveillance programs
Sarcastic wrote:Fast forward a bit. Next elections, do you vote for... Christie or Hillary or nobody?
http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/13/18924974-clinton-and-christie-vie-for-2016-spotlight-in-chicago
ExPatriatePen wrote:Sarcastic wrote:Fast forward a bit. Next elections, do you vote for... Christie or Hillary or nobody?
http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/13/18924974-clinton-and-christie-vie-for-2016-spotlight-in-chicago
Santorum/Bachman... Three cheers for actually puting some of this NSA Prism data to "good use"Spoiler:
shafnutz05 wrote:Libertarian candidate
GaryRissling wrote:What would be interesting is that if a focal point of the election were to become who would be most likely to roll back the intrusion on civil liberties under Bush/Obama, it may not be a guy like Rand Paul (but it may)- but it sure as hell ain't gonna be Hillary.
Factorial wrote:I wouldn't count on it. Only 53% of people disprove to varying degrees with the programs at this point and that election is three years from now.
Factorial wrote:GaryRissling wrote:What would be interesting is that if a focal point of the election were to become who would be most likely to roll back the intrusion on civil liberties under Bush/Obama, it may not be a guy like Rand Paul (but it may)- but it sure as hell ain't gonna be Hillary.
I wouldn't count on it. Only 53% of people disprove to varying degrees with the programs at this point and that election is three years from now.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests