penny lane wrote:I'd rather watch Olympic hockey than outdoor hockey. The NHL needs to make that decision ASAP.
Letang Is The Truth wrote:i dont understand why people are upset at this for being a money grab? heaven forbid people try to maximize their profits.
Pitt87 wrote:columbia wrote:It's pretty cold in Chicago in March.....trust me, I've experienced it.
I was just there March 28th... it was 22 degrees.
It just went from being a cool event (because of the once a year rarity, special day on New Years where the whole fam can get together and watch etc) to just another ho hum thing for the sponsors, not the fans. This isn't about doing something good for the people who watch the sport, to welcome hockey back from the Olympics (as if any real fan will miss olympic hockey for 2 weeks), its aout plastering advertisments everywhere and putting 24/7 coverage of the 'charade' on NHLN for 2 weeks straight. Factor in the almost guaranteed **** hockey that is a byproduct, especially that game in SoCal, and I'm just not into it. It went from being special, to meh.
knighsb wrote:Go to Internet and type in
Ticket breakdown & prices
I can get access on Tues 9/17 at noon. Anybody else on Tuesday?
llipgh2 wrote:Meh, after my rotten experience at the Winter Classic, I'll pass. I'm not one to sit outside and brave the elements for anything. Even hockey.
drnort wrote:I went 300 level sidelines at $179 a ticket. I think the view will be fantastic.
The Colonel wrote:llipgh2 wrote:Meh, after my rotten experience at the Winter Classic, I'll pass. I'm not one to sit outside and brave the elements for anything. Even hockey.
Before the Winter Classic here in Pittsburgh, I had a co worker say to me, how cold it willl be (before we knew what the weather was going to do) to watch a game outdoors in January. Dummy happened to be a STH for the Steelers. He didnt use his head when he said that to me. Haha
Users browsing this forum: knives of ice and 12 guests