Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
Crankshaft wrote:lemieuxReturns wrote:I think the better question is :
If the penguins keep winning and play this well defensively, does Letang become unnecessary? This is his final year before his new contract and all the trade restrictions kick in.
Does a 19 year old who has a good stretch of 9 games replace a Norris Trophy finalist? Is that the question?
Crankshaft wrote:lemieuxReturns wrote:I think the better question is :
If the penguins keep winning and play this well defensively, does Letang become unnecessary? This is his final year before his new contract and all the trade restrictions kick in.
Does a 19 year old who has a good stretch of 9 games replace a Norris Trophy finalist? Is that the question?
Troy Loney wrote:Some pretty big assumptions being made after a three game home stretch against 2 definitely terrible teams and one potentially terrible, likely mediocre team.
Dickie Dunn wrote:Solid game and solid start to the season.
On the Canes' second goal, glad to see Scuderi still believes laying down a foot outside the crease is appropriate defense. Dude is gonna drive me crazy for the next 4 years.
Beveridge wrote:Dickie Dunn wrote:Solid game and solid start to the season.
On the Canes' second goal, glad to see Scuderi still believes laying down a foot outside the crease is appropriate defense. Dude is gonna drive me crazy for the next 4 years.
Errey was right though. 90 out of 100 times the player is going to shoot that right into Scud's body. I think for a goaltender knowing that he is going to take away the ice makes positioning easier knowing if it gets through it's going to come up high.
sil wrote:The only thing that ever keeps me thinking about the possibility of trading Letang is the potential return (which makes me giddy). Other than that, trading him is about as far from my mind as possible.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests