bhaw wrote:Fire DB
bhaw wrote:Whether or not certain posters are content/indifferent or not is irrelevant. The problem is that the team and organization appear indifferent to the last 4 years.
pensfan1989 wrote:Who has been held accountable for 3 years of playoffs with 3 straight losses in deciding series?
penscup wrote:Man I get so sick of seeing the "4 straight years of playoff failure" repeated here over and over because it is such a lie.
2010 - team was burnt out - very difficult to make the finals 3 straight years - still made it to 2nd round which has to count for something. Lost to Habs in 7 in a very tight series.
2011 - injuries - nothing more needs said really - almost even pulled an upset going 7 again.
2012 - yeah that was a failure
2013 - made it to 3rd round which again should count for something. Embarrassing yes, but not total failure.
Really only 2 years of playoff failure at the most.
but go ahead and keep repeating the lie to try and further your agenda.
penscup wrote:Man I get so sick of seeing the "4 straight years of playoff failure" repeated here over and over because it is such a lie.
2010 - team was burnt out - very difficult to make the finals 3 straight years - still made it to 2nd round which has to count for something. Lost to Habs in 7 in a very tight series.
2011 - injuries - nothing more needs said really - almost even pulled an upset going 7 again.
2012 - yeah that was a failure
2013 - made it to 3rd round which again should count for something. Embarrassing yes, but not total failure.
Really only 2 years of playoff failure at the most.
but go ahead and keep repeating the lie to try and further your agenda.
Idoit40fans wrote:I want the team to show more backbone than a worm in the playoffs. They managed to win 3/4 and then go on to lose 3/3. Are you suggesting that that isn't a horrible failure?
penscup wrote:You people wanted the team to go deep in the playoffs without Crosby & Malkin??...riiiiiiiiiiggghhhhht.
Wow. Can't get more delusional than that.
MRandall25 wrote:I'd argue there's no way they should have even won 3 games that series, let alone won 3 of 4 before losing the rest.
penscup wrote:MRandall25 wrote:I'd argue there's no way they should have even won 3 games that series, let alone won 3 of 4 before losing the rest.
This.
The fact that series went 7 is a testament to Bylsma's good coaching, but instead of giving him some credit for almost pulling the upset and playing a great series with a severely handicapped team, those with an agenda and those who want to try and revise history attempt to label it as a failure.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests